Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Charlo-Cota Main Event Averaged 1,832,000 Viewers For FOX

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    But but But PBC Failing doe...Charlo doe. LOL. These are great numbers especially when the fighter was a replacement. The telecast held the attention of 1.2 million people. And Rigo benefited as well.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by Phenom View Post
      an average of 1,265,000 combined viewers watched this tripleheader Sunday night on FOX, FOX Deportes and FOX Sports’ streaming services.

      An average audience of 1,385,000 watched the three-fight telecast headlined by Williams-Hurd, which aired on a Saturday night.

      Someone is lying here so who is it?
      First off since when do we combine FOX, FOX deportes (spanish broadcast) in the ratings or add streaming numbers? LMAO The Nielsen tv ratings was 1.2M. And they mention the Hurd fight and give you JUST the nielsen ratings (he reported truthfully on that one) but before he gave you that he gave you the BS inflated number adding Spanish broadcast and streaming but didn't compare that to the spanish and streaming numbers of the Hurd fight so that you don't see how much a drop this fight drew.



      And no mention that this fight is now the dead last of the series dropping lower then the previous worst Leo Santa Cruz fight that drew 1.376M. This card being the dead worst of the series and dead worst in it's time slot are 2 major points that FOX News I mean Keith Idec/Boxingscene refused to report on.

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by Phenom View Post
        Which boxing events did better this year?
        In ratings? Porter vs Ugas did better, so did Williams vs Hurd and Charlo vs Korobov and Thurman vs Lopez. But obviously you can't compare FOX ratings with FS1 or ESPN or Showtime ratings because FOX is in many more homes.

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by bigdunny1 View Post
          First off since when do we combine FOX, FOX deportes (spanish broadcast) in the ratings or add streaming numbers? The Nielsen ratings was 1.2M. And they mention the Hurd fight and give you JUST the nielsen ratings (he reported truthfully on that one) but before he gave you that he gave you the BS inflated number adding Spanish broadcast and streaming but didn't compare that to the spanish and streaming numbers of the Hurd fight so that you don't see how much a drop this fight drew.



          And no mention that this fight is now the dead last of the series dropping lower then the previous worst Leo Santa Cruz fight that drew 1.376M. This card being the dead worst of the series and dead worst in it's time slot are 2 major points that Keith boy refused to report on.
          It was non-title fights and still pulled better numbers than most UFC Fox cards

          Name highest tv rating for boxing this year

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by pillowfists98 View Post
            In ratings? Porter vs Ugas did better, so did Williams vs Hurd and Charlo vs Korobov and Thurman vs Lopez. But obviously you can't compare FOX ratings with FS1 or ESPN or Showtime ratings because FOX is in many more homes.
            All of those had title fights on the cards and Charlos fought on the same card last year

            This did a little bit less than those cards and there were no belts on the line so how is it not good ratings? What would be good in your opinion

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by pillowfists98 View Post
              In ratings? Porter vs Ugas did better, so did Williams vs Hurd and Charlo vs Korobov and Thurman vs Lopez. But obviously you can't compare FOX ratings with FS1 or ESPN or Showtime ratings because FOX is in many more homes.
              THIS ^^^^^

              Keith Idec - Senior writer/columnist 4 http://BoxingScene.com , a CBS site.

              BoxingScene owned by CBS and CBS owns Showtime one of the top networks for PBC. No conflict of interest right? And the top writer refuses to report on the 2 major bits of news in these TV ratings. It came in dead last for the series and dead last on Network TV during it's timeslot. Things they mentioned for year when reporting on ESPN, HBO and any other promoter/network TV ratings somehow don't get mentioned ONCE in this article.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by bigdunny1 View Post
                This is now the trend from these articles on boxingscene look how they report ratings from any of the other promoters/networks and look at how PBC ratings are now reported. All a sudden on Network or Cable ratings they now only report the Main Event numbers? And refused to even mention that it was dead last on network tv or that this is now the dead last worst ratings since the deal with FOX. Hell even the TV Ratings websites make this shyt dummy proof with color index's to show you what is considered good or below avg ratings. Well Boxingscene is owned by CBS whenever bad ratings come out for PBC they either spin it and mention other things going on during that night to defend or like in this shyt by Keith Idec they literally just refuse to tell you about it finishing dead last for the series and for the night. This is now some Donald Trump reporting FOX News type shyt now.
                This was from just a few days ago:

                More Than 800K Viewers Tune In For Mikaela Mayer's Latest Win
                https://www.boxingscene.com/more-800...st-win--140263

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by bigdunny1 View Post
                  THIS ^^^^^

                  Keith Idec - Senior writer/columnist 4 http://BoxingScene.com , a CBS site.

                  BoxingScene owned by CBS and CBS owns Showtime one of the top networks for PBC. No conflict of interest right? And the top writer refuses to report on the 2 major bits of news in these TV ratings. It came in dead last for the series and dead last on Network TV during it's timeslot. Things they mentioned for year when reporting on ESPN, HBO and any other promoter/network TV ratings somehow don't get mentioned ONCE in this article.
                  They obviously have an agenda. Remember this article? https://www.boxingscene.com/cbs-fina...iewers--137804
                  What a joke. Making it seem like Wilder was responsible for the 13 million people watching lol.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by Phenom View Post
                    All of those had title fights on the cards and Charlos fought on the same card last year

                    This did a little bit less than those cards and there were no belts on the line so how is it not good ratings? What would be good in your opinion
                    I already said I don't blame them for the ratings being low. Harrison vs Charlo rematch would have done much better ratings. Its just bad luck.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by Sweet Jones View Post
                      Countdown to bigdunny1’s wall of AntiPBC text in 5...4...3...
                      Lmaoooo that dude is so miserable and weird

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP