Comments Thread For: Andrade: GGG, Canelo Not The Best Talents at 160 - Just Popular

[joseph5620]

Dude it's easy to sway an argument in your favour when you want to make it look like you are right, so let's go the other way. Ok so who has Andrade actually fought and beaten? Ok he went life and death with Vanes, won a disputed split decision, then a split decision against Jack Culcay hmm not looking good. He beat a couple no names at 160 for that 'title'. Ok Canelo has beaten the who's who at 160 already, GGG & Jacobs, easy work. In his spare time he won a belt at 168. At 154 he mopped the floor with a prime Trout. Miguel Cotto? No problem for Canelo. Amir Khan got dealt the way he should have, out cold in the 6th. Lara couldn't run fast enough in his fight with Canelo, easy work. You wanna see poo poo in the ring with Canelo? You will be witnessing a homicide. But look I might be wrong I expect him to make easy work of Sulecki. Remember Sulecki almost got KTFO by Gabe Rosado so we'll see!

This is a lie I see repeated by people that don't watch fights and only look up the result. Andrade clearly beat Vanes. It wasn't even close.The one judge that scored against him was heavily criticized and the commentary stated he would probably never get hired for a championship fight again.

[Boxing_1013]

I read like one line & you re jogged my memory. Never quote me on this site again. I seen you say too much clown shlt on here.

Never in your life quote me on here again.

Jacobs trainer does not want him to fight Andrade. That fight is not happening besides Jacobs is moving up to 168.


I don’t agree that Culcay & Vanes are the only guys he fought with a pulse & I don't agree he didn't impress, buy you offered your opinion to me so what can I do? Just tell you I don't agree. Matter of fact I have an Andrade resume thread I'll be posting tomorrow. I hope you see it.

Straight laughable. 3 belts in 2 divisions & never lost. But hasn't done much more than Sulecki. This shlt is truly sad. I just want ya'll to bet me at this point. Not 1 of you dudes is man enough to put money behind what you're saying. If Andrade is as sweet as apple pie & is gonna get crushed. Take my bet. I'm begging you. If Andrade gets stopped in 6 rounds or less or wins 3 rounds or less vs any guy you respect, you win. I want anyone on this forum who sees this to take this bet, this is an open call out. Show me ya'll believe what you say! If no one responds to this I may even make a thread.


Did you not read the article? Andrade was not moved or promoted the way Canelo or GGG was. So obviously they deserve more shine if we're going by that cause they capatilized on opportunities he didn’t even have. Smfh.
If he hasn't done much more than Sulecki then why isn't there anyway he should lose Saturday? �������� By that logic what you're saying doesn't even make sense. I really want you to answer that question btw. Cause you're pretending Andrade & Sulecki are on the same level. So why doesn't Sulecki have a better chance then that??? ������

I'll definitely look forward to the resume thread man...no hate at all..
I know I used to scratch my head at some of the hate GGG gets on his resume and as someone who has followed him for a while, I think he gets way too much stick for it being bad in my humble opinion...so maybe you know more about Andrade's guys than me and can break it down in a thread like that.

That being said...yeah other than Vanes and Culcay I just can't see another guy on there that I rate at all...maybe Akavov as we already spoke about but I'd like to see Akavov in with someone else too to see if his performance vs BJS was a fluke or legit...if it's legit Andrade should get more credit for that.

Walter...I mean he has no one on his resume and fought all of his fights in his home country in Africa you know...I just would have liked to see a demolition of him by Andrade...not 12 rounds...yes he dominated and yes the KO isn't his game...but I just want a little more from him against guys that shouldn't be on his level...especially if we going to put him at the tippy top of the ladder.

Honestly my assessment of Andrade and Sulecki is just based on commen opponents/what they've done vs guys I rate as good fighters...I see your point about belts etc and amateur accolades...the amateur skills matter to me as well and I like those...just when Sulecki stepped up to Jacobs he did well...just wasn't quite as good...I don't think Andrade has beaten anyone as good as Danny...and I think Sulecki apparently beat Culcay better than Andrade did...Sulecki has a few other OK wins...Centeno Rosado and Proksa...2 by KO...Andrade I'm sure has a few other OK wins as well besides Vanes and Culcay...just my 2 cents that they have basically performed on the same level from what I've seen so far.

My comment about Sulecki having no chance to win was just due to the fight being in RI where Andrade is from...I can't see Sulecki KOing him as he doesn't have much power and Andrade is hard to hit anyway...I think Sulecki's high side is winning an 8-4 fight and that won't get it done imo when you're fighting a guy in his backyard...I think Andrade could win 10-2 and I really look forward to this one on Saturday night to see his level and also Sulecki's

My friendly advice would be to not let the detractors get under your skin btw...if he wins this weekend he will surely get his shot at GGG or Canelo and will get his chance to prove you right...if he can look really good this weekend and dominate I think he has a good chance of legitimately beating Canelo or GGG right now...whether he would get the decision if he actually wins is another thing.

Good convo man you make some good points. Looking forward to this one on Saturday

[robbyheartbaby]

I read like one line & you re jogged my memory. Never quote me on this site again. I seen you say too much clown shlt on here.

Wow you actually stalk my s***. Of course that's me you nuffie hence the name!

Never quote me on this site again.