I don't because he's too obstinate and stubborn. Instead following protocol he chooses to buck the system.
For decades, their have been final eliminators within the WBC. So why does Whyte thinks that he is somehow exempt or above the rules?
Back in the 1970s there was a final eliminator between the no.1 and no.2 contenders; Ken Norton vs Jimmy Young and the winner would have become the mandatory challenger for Muhammad Ali's WBC title. Which was then Ken Norton.
For decades, their have been final eliminators within the WBC. So why does Whyte thinks that he is somehow exempt or above the rules?
Back in the 1970s there was a final eliminator between the no.1 and no.2 contenders; Ken Norton vs Jimmy Young and the winner would have become the mandatory challenger for Muhammad Ali's WBC title. Which was then Ken Norton.
Comment