Comments Thread For: Roach: Thurman 'Terrible' In Last Fight; Will Run From Pacquiao

[IceTrayDaGang]

Can't you read? I said lost recently. Fighting bums inbetween means nothing. Pacquiao picks fighters on the down. Always has.

oh recently now?? you mean like this --

floyd vs --

conor = loss to nate diaz
berto = loss to vic ortiz
pacuiao = loss to marquez, bradley
maidana = loss to devon, khan
cotto = loss to marg, manny (got batter in these 2 fights too)
victor ortiz = loss to maidana
molsey - loss to cotto

buahaahahahahahah!!!!!!!!!

[Robbie Barrett]

floyd vs --

conor = loss to nate diaz
berto = loss to vic ortiz
pacuiao = loss to marquez, bradley
maidana = loss to devon, khan
cotto = loss to marg, manny (got batter in these 2 fights too)
victor ortiz = loss to maidana
molsey - loss to cotto

buahaahahahahahah!!!!!!!!!

Those weren't in their last few fights. These facts i brought up are really hurting you, that much is clear.

[IceTrayDaGang]

Those weren't in their last few fights. These facts i brought up are really hurting you, that much is clear.

yes they were... those were "recent".. you brought it up man.

[IceTrayDaGang]

Those weren't in their last few fights. These facts i brought up are really hurting you, that much is clear.

you see, if you look at floyd's resume, his best wins are cotto, pac, canelo. 2 out 3 are the same guys that you're dissing! lmao!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Robbie Barrett]

yes they were... those were "recent".. you brought it up man.

Recently/last few means their last 1-3 fights. I know you struggle with reading.

[IceTrayDaGang]

Recently/last few means their last 1-3 fights. I know you struggle with reading.

yes, last 1-3 fights. didnt conor loss to nate then beat him in the rematch (barely) then beat alvarez then fought floyd???? that's not 1-3 fights? LOLOLOLOL!!! isaac!! you good?

berto = loss to soto karass then beat chambers and lopez then fought floyd. aint that 1-3 fights isaac???

manny = loss to bradley got knocked the fvvck out against marquez, cherry pick rios, bradley and algieri then fought floyd. aint that 1-3 fights???? should i keep going??? !!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Robbie Barrett]

yes, last 1-3 fights. didnt conor loss to nate then beat him in the rematch (barely) then beat alvarez then fought floyd???? that's not 1-3 fights? LOLOLOLOL!!! isaac!! you good?

berto = loss to soto karass then beat chambers and lopez then fought floyd. aint that 1-3 fights isaac???

manny = loss to bradley got knocked the fvvck out against marquez, cherry pick rios, bradley and algieri then fought floyd. aint that 1-3 fights???? should i keep going??? !!!!!!!!!!!!!

Cong**** you named a couple of money fights before he retired. Half of Pacquiao's fights are fighters coming off recent losses. That's no coincidence, that's cherry picking.

[IceTrayDaGang]

Cong**** you named a couple of money fights before he retired. Half of Pacquiao's fights are fighters coming off recent losses. That's no coincidence, that's cherry picking.

got'em!!!! dont play with me boy.

i like how you went and switched it to "recent" after i expose your bs! buahah!!

[IceTrayDaGang]

Cong**** you named a couple of money fights before he retired. Half of Pacquiao's fights are fighters coming off recent losses. That's no coincidence, that's cherry picking.

floyd cherry picked manny! yes, the same manny that you're calling a cherry picker! fighting guys that were coming off "recent" loss... so why the fvvck did floyd fight manny then? lol!!!!!!!!!

[Robbie Barrett]

got'em!!!! dont play with me boy.

i like how you went and switched it to "recent" after i expose your bs! buahah!!

Here's my first reply to you.

I agree he does. Recently lost (yes recently as in their last few fights ) and bad performances are fighters Pacquiao likes fighting. His resume is full of them.

So how did i switch it? As i said you can't read or understand basic English.