Stop there is no justification for Breaz getting shot with Wilder over Whyte. Breaz did nothing to earn it Whyte won 9 chisx2 and Ex champ Parker. He’s frustrated
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: WBC Prez Fires Back at Dillian Whyte Over Recent Claims
Collapse
-
Silly main is making a mess and a mockery out of the WBC belt but want to make splashes about everybody else. He is just a fat greasy prick who makes decisions about what he wants and not what's best for the sport.
Whyte been the number 1 for how long? That's not how things normally go. WBC is very corrupt.
Comment
-
Why offer Whyte interim belt when there is no reason to. Wilder is active and Whyte has long been ranked number 1 and yet he has to fight for interim belt? For what?
Comment
-
Originally posted by greenarcher89 View PostWhy offer Whyte interim belt when there is no reason to. Wilder is active and Whyte has long been ranked number 1 and yet he has to fight for interim belt? For what?
Comment
-
Originally posted by bronx7 View PostStop there is no justification for Breaz getting shot with Wilder over Whyte. Breaz did nothing to earn it Whyte won 9 chisx2 and Ex champ Parker. He’s frustrated
Comment
-
Originally posted by DARTH SILKWORMS View PostI don't understand what your reply has to do with my post. The article says the WBC is claiming to have offered Dillian an interim title fight since October. If you think the WBC is lying, so be it. I don't know who is lying. I'm just saying I like the IBF rule that if you turn down an eliminator or title fight, you get removed from the ratings.
Before then they ask Whyte/Ortiz to fight to become the "2nd" mandatory, before then they ask Whyte/Breazeale to fight without calling for a purse bid.
Breazeale then went on to fight Molina in a fight which was never a "Final Eliminator"......Few weeks before the fight the WBC then called it a final eliminator AFTER denying it to a boxing journalist (This caught out Whyte).
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ray* View PostThe WBC mandated Whyte/Breazeale as a final eliminator when they thought Fury/Wilder II was happening. The moment Fury ducked the rematch they made Wilder fight Breazeale straight out.
Before then they ask Whyte/Ortiz to fight to become the "2nd" mandatory, before then they ask Whyte/Breazeale to fight without calling for a purse bid.
Breazeale then went on to fight Molina in a fight which was never a "Final Eliminator"......Few weeks before the fight the WBC then called it a final eliminator AFTER denying it to a boxing journalist (This caught out Whyte).
Comment
-
Originally posted by Corbett View PostEven worst the WBC initially announced the Breazeale v Molina as a “final eliminator” but got so much stick and obviously Whyte complained and the WBC officially stated that it was a mistake and it was only an “eliminator” but then bizarrely changed their mind after their convention the whole thing stinks.
The facts of what the WBC are doing is in print. You have the knowledge to dissect those information, whether they are doing it to protect Wilder or not, those facts are in print. So to try and paint Whyte as someone that has been afforded the opportunity to fight for the title is just plain ******.
The same organisation that ordered/mandate the Fury/Wilder rematch as a mandatory when there was NO need to. That fight was going to happen whether they were involved or not.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Corbett View PostWilder turned down more money avoiding Whyte than he earned off Ortiz and Fury combined.
If Whytes such an easy fight why hasn’t Wilder shut him up ?
Comment
Comment