Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: WBC Prez Fires Back at Dillian Whyte Over Recent Claims

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Stop there is no justification for Breaz getting shot with Wilder over Whyte. Breaz did nothing to earn it Whyte won 9 chisx2 and Ex champ Parker. He’s frustrated

    Comment


    • #62
      Breazeale only got a shot as a settlement for being attacked by Wilders brother in a hotel after the Gerald Washington fight.
      Breazeale never earned his shot the whole thing stinks.

      Comment


      • #63
        Silly main is making a mess and a mockery out of the WBC belt but want to make splashes about everybody else. He is just a fat greasy prick who makes decisions about what he wants and not what's best for the sport.

        Whyte been the number 1 for how long? That's not how things normally go. WBC is very corrupt.

        Comment


        • #64
          Why offer Whyte interim belt when there is no reason to. Wilder is active and Whyte has long been ranked number 1 and yet he has to fight for interim belt? For what?

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by greenarcher89 View Post
            Why offer Whyte interim belt when there is no reason to. Wilder is active and Whyte has long been ranked number 1 and yet he has to fight for interim belt? For what?
            Exactly the Intetim doesn’t even make Whyte a mandatory lol it just costs more sanctioning fees it’s pointless.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by bronx7 View Post
              Stop there is no justification for Breaz getting shot with Wilder over Whyte. Breaz did nothing to earn it Whyte won 9 chisx2 and Ex champ Parker. He’s frustrated
              100% and Wilder best win before he fought for the title was a strange win against Malik Scott who Chisora knocked out.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by DARTH SILKWORMS View Post
                I don't understand what your reply has to do with my post. The article says the WBC is claiming to have offered Dillian an interim title fight since October. If you think the WBC is lying, so be it. I don't know who is lying. I'm just saying I like the IBF rule that if you turn down an eliminator or title fight, you get removed from the ratings.
                The WBC mandated Whyte/Breazeale as a final eliminator when they thought Fury/Wilder II was happening. The moment Fury ducked the rematch they made Wilder fight Breazeale straight out.

                Before then they ask Whyte/Ortiz to fight to become the "2nd" mandatory, before then they ask Whyte/Breazeale to fight without calling for a purse bid.

                Breazeale then went on to fight Molina in a fight which was never a "Final Eliminator"......Few weeks before the fight the WBC then called it a final eliminator AFTER denying it to a boxing journalist (This caught out Whyte).

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Ray* View Post
                  The WBC mandated Whyte/Breazeale as a final eliminator when they thought Fury/Wilder II was happening. The moment Fury ducked the rematch they made Wilder fight Breazeale straight out.

                  Before then they ask Whyte/Ortiz to fight to become the "2nd" mandatory, before then they ask Whyte/Breazeale to fight without calling for a purse bid.

                  Breazeale then went on to fight Molina in a fight which was never a "Final Eliminator"......Few weeks before the fight the WBC then called it a final eliminator AFTER denying it to a boxing journalist (This caught out Whyte).
                  Even worst the WBC initially announced the Breazeale v Molina as a “final eliminator” but got so much stick and obviously Whyte complained and the WBC officially stated that it was a mistake and it was only an “eliminator” but then bizarrely changed their mind after their convention the whole thing stinks.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by Corbett View Post
                    Even worst the WBC initially announced the Breazeale v Molina as a “final eliminator” but got so much stick and obviously Whyte complained and the WBC officially stated that it was a mistake and it was only an “eliminator” but then bizarrely changed their mind after their convention the whole thing stinks.
                    Yep, Anyone that supports the WBC in this blatantly corrupt situation with Whyte has to be a fan boy. NO two ways about it, these sort of fans aren't good for our sport and then less of them the better.

                    The facts of what the WBC are doing is in print. You have the knowledge to dissect those information, whether they are doing it to protect Wilder or not, those facts are in print. So to try and paint Whyte as someone that has been afforded the opportunity to fight for the title is just plain ******.

                    The same organisation that ordered/mandate the Fury/Wilder rematch as a mandatory when there was NO need to. That fight was going to happen whether they were involved or not.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by Corbett View Post
                      Wilder turned down more money avoiding Whyte than he earned off Ortiz and Fury combined.
                      If Whytes such an easy fight why hasn’t Wilder shut him up ?
                      Because theres no challenge in it. Wilder wants to fight the best It would be like beating up the annoying handicapped kid at school.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP