Nothing at all makes sense about the notion of a lineal champ, particularly in an era when there are 4-5 recognized belts. As I said before, there is no true lineal champ in any division in boxing. Champions vacate, retire, get stripped, etc. In no division is there a current world champion who can trace his title back to the first recognized champion in his division. The MW division, in fact, is probably one of the the divisions with the least-traceable championship lineage.
To answer your question, Bernard Hopkins had been IBF MW champ since the mid-90's but wasn't considered the true/unified champ until 2001 when he beat Felix Trinidad (who won his WBA belt against the unspectacular Wiliam Joppy). None of these guys have any link at all to Sugar Ray Robinson, Harry Greb, Stanley Ketchel, Bob Fitzsimmons, Nonpareil Jack Dempsey...
The lineal title is not a real thing. What else can I say to change your mind about it?
To answer your question, Bernard Hopkins had been IBF MW champ since the mid-90's but wasn't considered the true/unified champ until 2001 when he beat Felix Trinidad (who won his WBA belt against the unspectacular Wiliam Joppy). None of these guys have any link at all to Sugar Ray Robinson, Harry Greb, Stanley Ketchel, Bob Fitzsimmons, Nonpareil Jack Dempsey...
The lineal title is not a real thing. What else can I say to change your mind about it?
Comment