Comments Thread For: Loeffler: Canelo Not Wanting Third GGG Fight Is Only Obstacle

[aboutfkntime]

so essentially you're just admitting that I clearly proved you wrong. He didn't back up as you claimed. He circled. As far as that Mexican style, what does that s*** even mean? Does it mean to get punched in your face non stop while hoping your opponent gets tired from punching you in the face like Margarito and munguia do? Is it fighting for a flashy 30 seconds each round but getting out landed and out worked overall like Canelo does? My preference would be seeing a badaass fight like Barrera and morales but otherwise that Mexican style is a gimmick to draw in gullible fans.

he got backed up you fkn idiot

he elected to NOT hold his ground and back Canelo up..... like he did in the first fight

again, you can call that whatever you like, because it does not matter..... Golovkin did not hold his ground, back Canelo up, and break Canelo down..... as per his gameplan

Canelo followed his gameplan perfectly

* effective aggression - CHECK
* clean hard punching - CHECK
* defense - CHECK
* ring generalship - CHECK

and no, pitty-pat pushed jabs are not valid scoring criteria

and the reason why pitty-pat jabs are not official scoring criteria in a professional boxing match..... is because some idiot would rock up and insist that his guy won the boxing match, despite his guy getting his face rearranged in the actual fight..... like what happened to Golovkin

says he is not a Golovkin fan..... blurts out the same silly golov-excuses as the rest of the idiots

[TonyGe]

Lmao Canelo LITERALLY landed almost every punch with full hip rotation & clean as can be while landing in combos to the face & body. Gstring coward diva literally just threw no rotation backfoot arm punches & jabs that he threw 1-2 at a time as instructed by his trainer the entire fight. You gtards are truly a pathetic group of butthurt losers but that has been evident since you clowns have resorted to excuses such as "ggg jabs are like power punches so they count more" or "ggg don't need to go to the body for mexican style,he only got outlanded by 100 body shots over 2 fights because jabs to the head count more"(they were all power shots btw TRUE power shots with full weight behind them)

Face the facts. Canelo got outworked in both fights. I've never heard such BS as the nonsense in your post. Canelo was clearly pushing a lot of punches when he got tired. There were also many cuffung punches landed by him.

[aboutfkntime]

Face the facts. Canelo got outworked in both fights. I've never heard such BS as the nonsense in your post. Canelo was clearly pushing a lot of punches when he got tired. There were also many cuffung punches landed by him.

pitty-pat pushed jabs are not official scoring criteria

clean hard punching is official scoring criteria

" out-worked " is only true if you do not get backed up and beaten up

* effective aggression
* clean hard punching
* defense
* ring generalship

also, Golovkin is not that accurate..... while you casuals were applauding Golovkin's " work ", the judges were scoring for Canelo's excellent defense

[aboutfkntime]

here is the real problem for Golovkin fans.....

..... as you excuse-making contortionists kill yourselves arguing the value of a jab..... a jab that was thrown by a guy who pleaded with his opponent to stand and fight him like a Mexican.....

..... you are forgetting one other thing.....

FACT: Canelo PROVED that he is a better fighter than Golovkin

he has better skills..... better defense..... faster hands..... a more well-rounded game..... better ringIQ..... and a better corner.....

he also has bigger balls than Golovkin..... who has badly under-achieved

[Jab jab boom]

he got backed up you fkn idiot

he elected to NOT hold his ground and back Canelo up..... like he did in the first fight

again, you can call that whatever you like, because it does not matter..... Golovkin did not hold his ground, back Canelo up, and break Canelo down..... as per his gameplan

Canelo followed his gameplan perfectly

* effective aggression - CHECK
* clean hard punching - CHECK
* defense - CHECK
* ring generalship - CHECK

and no, pitty-pat pushed jabs are not valid scoring criteria

and the reason why pitty-pat jabs are not official scoring criteria in a professional boxing match..... is because some idiot would rock up and insist that his guy won the boxing match, despite his guy getting his face rearranged in the actual fight..... like what happened to Golovkin

says he is not a Golovkin fan..... blurts out the same silly golov-excuses as the rest of the idiots

so now you're trying to spin it and say that because he didn't back canelo up, he backed up?? Damn you make sinning your old ass way too easy. ggg didn't back up at all. If your senior citizen ass remembers what it was like to be in a ring back in 1973, you'd know that if you backed up, your back would end up on the ropes at some point. Backing up, running and circling are all different things. Either you're too ****** to know that or you're so old that you're senile and can't remember what it's like to be in a ring. Now you're another example of a flip flopper. I know that the only boxer you love more than Canelo is mayweather. You've probably spent yrs arguing how mayweather didn't run in fights and didn't back up, but here you are claiming that ggg circling Canelo was backing up. Lmaooo a 68 yr old hypocrite

[aboutfkntime]

so now you're trying to spin it and say that because he didn't back canelo up, he backed up?? Damn you make sinning your old ass way too easy. ggg didn't back up at all. If your senior citizen ass remembers what it was like to be in a ring back in 1973, you'd know that if you backed up, your back would end up on the ropes at some point. Backing up, running and circling are all different things. Either you're too ****** to know that or you're so old that you're senile and can't remember what it's like to be in a ring. Now you're another example of a flip flopper. I know that the only boxer you love more than Canelo is mayweather. You've probably spent yrs arguing how mayweather didn't run in fights and didn't back up, but here you are claiming that ggg circling Canelo was backing up. Lmaooo a 68 yr old hypocrite

that is at least the 2nd time you have put (incorrect) words in my mouth

I said..... Golovkin did not hold his ground..... he did not back Canelo up..... and he did not break Canelo down..... as per his gameplan.....

Sanchez wanted Golovkin to take the fight to Canelo, and he prepared/trained him accordingly..... but, nope..... one guy fought his fight, and the other guy did not

one guy displayed effective aggression (official scoring criteria #1)..... and the other guy did not

one guy has an argument for winning that fight through clean hard punching (official scoring criteria #2)..... the other guy does not

one guy displayed noticeably better defense than the other guy (official scoring criteria #3)

one guy fought his fight, and inflicted the gameplan on his opponent (official scoring criteria #4)..... and the other guy did not

I mean..... without even going into the specifics above - which should be clearly obvious - your argument, that the guy who could not get his game going and who got beaten up..... won the fight..... is a real hard sell..... which is why Sanchez admitted that Golovkin did not win the fight, and why the only judge who awarded the first fight to Golovkin awarded the rematch to Canelo

you guys are pushing shlt uphill with a pointed stick

lucky that you are not one of those rabid golovkin fans

no, wait..... LMAO

[kushking]

Face the facts. Canelo got outworked in both fights. I've never heard such BS as the nonsense in your post. Canelo was clearly pushing a lot of punches when he got tired. There were also many cuffung punches landed by him.

You either didn't watch the fight or are just a lying ggg fan,which is it?



Where in this entire fight did ggg do more than throwing 1-2 punch arm punches that never had near the hip rotation virtually all of nelos punches had?

Canelo LITERALLY teed off at ggg at will with multiple shot combos down & upstairs,CLEANLY

Foldlovkin LITERALLY backed up 85% of the fight & WAY MORE than Nelo in 1st fight. Ggg failed yet again to score anything but jabs CLEANLY in 85% of the fight .

Ggg yet again missed majority of his punches & never landed majority of his arsenal like he does vs hobos. Canelo landed career high type percentages & mayweather like accuracy CLEANLY
Somehow the ggg stan narrative is that canelo ran but gg didn't which is complete bs,how can you by definition run if you are against ropes? On the other hand 3g RAN by his OWN definition.

[Jab jab boom]

that is at least the 2nd time you have put (incorrect) words in my mouth

I said..... Golovkin did not hold his ground..... he did not back Canelo up..... and he did not break Canelo down..... as per his gameplan.....

Sanchez wanted Golovkin to take the fight to Canelo, and he prepared/trained him accordingly..... but, nope..... one guy fought his fight, and the other guy did not

one guy displayed effective aggression (official scoring criteria #1)..... and the other guy did not

one guy has an argument for winning that fight through clean hard punching (official scoring criteria #2)..... the other guy does not

one guy displayed noticeably better defense than the other guy (official scoring criteria #3)

one guy fought his fight, and inflicted the gameplan on his opponent (official scoring criteria #4)..... and the other guy did not

I mean..... without even going into the specifics above - which should be clearly obvious - your argument, that the guy who could not get his game going and who got beaten up..... won the fight..... is a real hard sell..... which is why Sanchez admitted that Golovkin did not win the fight, and why the only judge who awarded the first fight to Golovkin awarded the rematch to Canelo

you guys are pushing shlt uphill with a pointed stick

lucky that you are not one of those rabid golovkin fans

no, wait..... LMAO

now you're trying to spin again and say that what you said was That ggg did not back Canelo up. But what you initially said was ggg got backed up. Here's your exact quote "Golovkin got backed up, and then beaten up" stop changing your tune after being proven wrong. At least pretend to stick by your mistakes.

[kushking]

now you're trying to spin again and say that what you said was That ggg did not back Canelo up. But what you initially said was ggg got backed up. Here's your exact quote "Golovkin got backed up, and then beaten up" stop changing your tune after being proven wrong. At least pretend to stick by your mistakes.

I just posted the fight And you already claimed ggg backed up in this exact thread.( Even though you claim its circling to do 100x more backing up than nelo in 1st fight when you claimed back then nelo ran) No surprise you hypocrite liar,you change your tune whenever ggg does or when either of you get owned.

[Jab jab boom]

I just posted the fight And you already claimed ggg backed up in this exact thread.( Even though you claim its circling to do 100x more backing up than nelo in 1st fight when you claimed back then nelo ran) No surprise you hypocrite liar,you change your tune whenever ggg does or when either of you get owned.

again, if I wrote that in this thread as you're saying, go back to that comment, copy and paste it. If not stfu and accept your L and quit Mexican style.