Comments Thread For: Hearn: If Joshua Loses Again, His Career is Not in a Great Place

[P4Pdunny]

pressure either bust pipes or it makes diamonds, two losses won't be the end of the world everything depends on his resilience and mindset

[kingstip9]

... win or lose, AJ is done, anyway...

One loss and people give up on fighters. No wonder fighters rarely take fights that risk their 0. You got “fans” like you that treat em like trash if they dare lose.
Reminds me of kovalev before he rematched Alvarez.

People making out like he’s “done” and “trash” and “exposed” and he should retire.
One win later and it’s like “oh he’s never looked better”

As they say, for the simpletons “your only as good as your last fight”

[donjigga11]

This undefeated **** had gotten to people’s heads. Louis, Ali, Holmes, Lewis, Tyson, Holyfield, Foreman, Frazier, Johnson, Dempsey, Liston and both klitschkos all lost more than once and greats.

Hearn doesn’t help AJ sometimes with the comments and pressure he puts on him in public.

[TrillScottHeron]

I know having a Hearn Interview/article is good for clicks from the sheep. But fu€k Boxing Scene do you need to post 2 everyday? He is not that entertaining. This isn’t news, this is sensationalism.

[Gideon lock]

Another blinder from captain obvious.

[Straightener]

Fans are fickle as **** these days

Joshua will be back with a **** ... losing might be the wake up call he needed

Became a big star too soon . Must be hard to stay hungry when you’re sitting on crazy money like he is

[vitali1999]

His career is a mess now. When he gets knocked cold by Ortiz again he won't be making the kind of money he's making now if he decides to continue on

[MDPopescu]

One loss and people give up on fighters. No wonder fighters rarely take fights that risk their 0. You got “fans” like you that treat em like trash if they dare lose.
Reminds me of kovalev before he rematched Alvarez.

People making out like he’s “done” and “trash” and “exposed” and he should retire.
One win later and it’s like “oh he’s never looked better”

As they say, for the simpletons “your only as good as your last fight”

... there's no need for such "clichées"...

... it wasn't a one punch KO... go back and re-watch the fight... it was an accumulation of factors... very poor defense... no adjustments... no "heart" and/or "mental resilience" (as about the "size of the fight in the dog")... at this level, such a complete fiasco can't just vanish unnoticed...

[Nomadic]

... there's no need for such "clichées"...

... it wasn't a one punch KO... go back and re-watch the fight... it was an accumulation of factors... very poor defense... no adjustments... no "heart" and/or "mental resilience" (as about the "size of the fight in the dog")... at this level, such a complete fiasco can't just vanish unnoticed...

Touched a lot of good points.

After reading this, it almost seems like he should have never been a boxer in the first place.

[MDPopescu]

... there's no need for such "clichées"...

... it wasn't a one punch KO... go back and re-watch the fight... it was an accumulation of factors... very poor defense... no adjustments... no "heart" and/or "mental resilience" (as about the "size of the fight in the dog")... at this level, such a complete fiasco can't just vanish unnoticed...

Touched a lot of good points.

After reading this, it almost seems like he should have never been a boxer in the first place.

I hope you're not laughing at me...

... it was always about that "Peter principle": is for every guy to rise in the hierarchy through promotion until they reach a level of respective incompetence... that's how it works (no matter how much "protected" someone is...)