Exclusive: Hypejob trashes AJ

[TonyGe]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/bo...-New-York.html

Ggg says despite fighting an absolute no hoper 10x worse than anyone AJ's fought, this clown has been all over the media talking mad crap about someone who has already accomplished much more than he ever will.

Go get your head read. Joshua just got his ass kicked by a fighter that was a huge underdog.

[TonyGe]

Man, you are totally ignorant.

First of all, bodies are different, canelo has a harder career than GGG and he started to box in professional since 15 years old.

It's not the same.


GGG has a very soft career with only two good rivals.

He has a soft career, thats a fact, look his resume, he never took risks, never wanted a fight against Ward in 168.

He is in his prime, a GGG of 28 years old without experience and too wild, would be a easy fight to Canelo with 28, years old.


You are a salty losers making a lot excuses but the biased is me lol

I support Rigo, i'm a fan of Floyd, Ward, Joshua, Wilder, Inoue, Donairez Pacquiao

It look like a mexican can't Say that canelo won because according to you is a biased

Ok, i Will Say you are a mexican hater. Ok?

Márquez was in his prime at 40 years old

Rigo was in prime at 36 years old

Rigo was not in his prime at age 36. Don't make me laugh.

[MulaKO]

Nobody is in their prime at 37 years old. Nobody. You're telling me Canelo is gonna be better at 37 than he currently is?

Also. Iirc, two judges had it 6-5 Canelo and one had it 6-5 GGG. That's clear eh?

Also. You think I have a bias for white European fighters. Do you think that's because I'm white? Is that what you're getting at? Because let assure you that I'm not white lmfao. I'm a minority just like you but unlike you I love the sport and not just people who look like myself. You make us all look bad. When I see posters like you it makes it easy for me to see how people like Trump and his followers hate you guys.

Mexican guy who only supports Mexicans and calls out people who dont racist. You dont even know the color of my skin but assume that I'm white because I "like white European fighters ".

Just happens that a lot white European boxers are good at the sport. Doesnt mean I hate people of color like you do.

Well fughin said

He doesn’t talk boxing , he talks Mexican

But he states he’s bias

[Mexican_Puppet]

Rigo was not in his prime at age 36. Don't make me laugh.

He had more speed than a younger Donaire

[Mexican_Puppet]

Well fughin said

He doesn’t talk boxing , he talks Mexican

But he states he’s bias

And you are a fuc.king stu.pid hater of mexican boxing

So, if i said that canelo won a close but clear decision against Golovkin , and destroyed his face, that means i'm biased lol

And GGG thrown the same amount of punches against canelo and vs Murray

Thats a fact

Márquez was in his prime when he K.od Pacquiao , and he was 40 years old

GGG had a soft career, that's another fact

[MulaKO]

And you are a fuc.king stu.pid hater of mexican boxing

So, if i said that canelo won a close but clear decision against Golovkin , and destroyed his face, that means i'm biased lol

And GGG thrown the same amount of punches against canelo and vs Murray

Thats a fact

Márquez was in his prime when he K.od Pacquiao , and he was 40 years old

GGG had a soft career, that's another fact

I don’t hate good boxers
I don’t care where their from or the color of their skin
You sir are a fughin racist
If it’s not Mexico , everyone else is wrong
Go check out what bias means
You ignorant fugh , can’t even call you ****** cause it’s not your fault

[MulaKO]

And you are a fuc.king stu.pid hater of mexican boxing

So, if i said that canelo won a close but clear decision against Golovkin , and destroyed his face, that means i'm biased lol

And GGG thrown the same amount of punches against canelo and vs Murray

Thats a fact

Márquez was in his prime when he K.od Pacquiao , and he was 40 years old

GGG had a soft career, that's another fact

How do you justify the fact you say GGG is a garbage fighter but Canelo had such a hard time with
Is Canelo garbage also

[TonyGe]

Canelo was 23, he was too young, GGG was a mature fighter with a lot of experience, with a soft career.

Too young. No he wasn't too young to fight Mayweather. He was simply outclassed by a superior fighter and gave up too much weight. Canelo was fighting as a pro since his teens. If you give Canelo all the skills he's learned since that fight and rematch Mayweather the result would still be a loss. Mayweather's style is wrong for Canelo and damned near everyone else. You can't stand in one spot against Mayweather and throw combinations. Canelo tends to do that. You have to be outstanding at cutting off the ring and exhibit good stamina to keep it up which Canelo still doesn't do.

[TonyGe]

He had more speed than a younger Donaire

So what!! He wasn't in his prime at that age.

[CauliflowerEars]

Listen, I like GGG too. I am a fan of his. I thought he beat Canelo twice but he was doing some serious trash talking there about Saunders don't you agree?

He said that he is no longer interested in a fight with Saunders until he proves himself. Also, how all the negative yellow press clippings and failed drug tests has turned him off about ever fighting him.

In addition he has accused Saunders of being a bully. Here's a quote from the article:

It seems Saunders just can't help himself when he comes upon people less able to defend themselves. Also, he lost his WBO middleweight belt - subsequently regained - to a failed drugs test.

Golovkin says: 'I look at his behaviour outside the ring. I see the other stories about him, the yellow press stories. To be a champion is to act like a champion. Unless he matures I am not interested in fighting him.'

I read the entire article as well. Another reportedly exact quote by GGG regarding Saunders that you didn't post was,

'I look at his opponents, and I tell him to win against better men. Until he does, not interested.'

That's the one thing he said that gave me pause. If he really feels that way, why the heck is he okay with fighting Steve Rolls ? I mean that rhetorically, of course. I think I know why.
The article also says,

"Saunders habitually complains that Golovkin declined to sign contracts when terms had been agreed for them to fight for the undisputed middleweight championship."
It's evident they've had past troubles negotiating and don't particularly care for each other.

I personally don't care for BJS, but dang I don't know how you deny his boxing talent. I suspect he is a tough style matchup for a lot of top MW's or SMW's. It's just another example of politics getting in the way of good fights for the fans. Wait until David Benavidez busts back on the scene. I'd like to see him and BJS go at it.

Anyhow, all this talk is mostly just fan and promotion "posturing". GGG, Canelo, Saunders, Wilder, Joshua, Fury, are all decent fighters with both positive and negative potential narratives. It's natural for fans of one or the other to see things differently or lend support one way or the other.
That article is obviously designed to paint Golovkin in a positive light, but I don't find it a stretch to perceive him as "doing some serious trash talking" and straying from his "wholesome, good guy" image. He is grabbing his share of loquacious headlines.
Money has a way of degrading even the best of intentions. It can blur our vision, make us soft, or compromise our integrity. What's funny is fandom sometimes does the same thing.
Peace.