Originally posted by sammybee
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Andy Ruiz Would Love a Joshua Rematch in Mexico
Collapse
-
The fight makes the most money in the U.K. But, if money isn’t the most important thing to him. And, there’s nothing in the contract stipulating that the rematch has to take place in the U.K. Ruiz has every right to have the fight take place wherever he wants it. I’ve actually been annoyed at Hearn’s smug, punk ass taking as if it’s almost an afterthought that the rematch will be in the U.K. Obviously this clown doesn’t understand he’s not calling any shots in this here situation.
Comment
-
Originally posted by sapo13 View PostWOW so it looks like the Belts are classified as MEXICAN belts now!! i thought they would be American titles like oscar de la hoya fernando vargas, mickey garcia.
Andy ruiz is an american citizen so i wonder why the belts arent cassified as American titles!! do they give you personal choice?
andy can do what he wants but a little american pride would be nice!!! after all he is an american citizen!! of mexican heritage!!
That being said he should look for a rematch in VEGAS more money!! then he can do a title defence in mexico if he wants!!
He was born in Mexico. That’s why they are calling it mexican titles.
Comment
-
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by hitking View PostThe fight makes the most money in the U.K. But, if money isn’t the most important thing to him. And, there’s nothing in the contract stipulating that the rematch has to take place in the U.K. Ruiz has every right to have the fight take place wherever he wants it. I’ve actually been annoyed at Hearn’s smug, punk ass taking as if it’s almost an afterthought that the rematch will be in the U.K. Obviously this clown doesn’t understand he’s not calling any shots in this here situation.
ie nothing left up for negotiation unless Ruiz wanted to offer to give up some of his comp in exchange for location or something like that, which Hearn can either accept or reject to stick with the original terms.
I can't imagine that the rematch clause would be silent on location and then go on to be described as 'bullet proof'.
Comment
Comment