Comments Thread For: Keith Thurman: How Am I the 'B' Side Against Manny Pacquiao?

[jmrf4435]

BECAUSE YOU ARE FIGHTING THE BEST FIGHTER OF ALL TIME..

these YOUNG DELUSIONAL DISRESPECTFUL FIGHTERS.

PACMAN HAS SOLD MORE ppv'S THAN ALL OF THURMANS OPPONENT COMBINED OOL

[True That]

Manny Pacquiao's boxing career started when his dad ate his dog.

[BritishBoxing92]

maybe casual boxing fans are not as familiar with Thurman as much as they are Pacquiao hence why some would consider him the B side instead off the A side?

or it could be his inactivity periods inbetween fights? anyway who cares this fight should be a decent match up...

[SweetPbfAli]

There's certainly a debate to be had. Throw Roy in there too

I think Roy is the generation before Floyd and Manny.

[Ganondorf]

I’m an American and I usually root for the American fighter but it depends on which version of both guys show up. The version of Keith that beat Porter and Danny gives Pacquiao a lot of trouble IMO.

The version of Thurman that got his ass kicked all around the ring for many moments has lots of trouble with Manny IMO.

Could go either way but I’m picking Manny by a 116-112 type Decision or a late stoppage. Could you imagine how Keef would act if he got stopped by Manny?

Don’t knock me out, son!

[dwayne3534]

Not above canelo anymore

[dwayne3534]

To be honest broner is probably more skilled than thurman. He was a b level fighter because all the greats are gone for the time being.

Gtfoh. Broner lost badly to Porter.

[Letmaku]

One Time has only beaten 2 champs, Old Timer beat 20 champs. Loser in this one should retire!

[Letmaku]

then if you watch that makes you a fraud.

Atleast Duran is lightweight fought Middleweights for less money compare to old midget Pacman's payday!

[Letmaku]

Boxing's big payday starts at welterweight that's why midget Pacman is there!