Comments Thread For: Wilder-Ortiz II A Done Deal, Eyed For September

[Fire4231]

Oh snap, I said woman didn't I? I meant b!tch, you are Wilder's little b!tch and you defend him no matter what kind of bum ass ***** he says or does. He's a fraud and his little b!tch a$$ fans are even worse. Is that better? ******a$$. And by the way, you sound more and more like Wilder's lover than his fan. Maybe if you come up for air, you would actually see what's going on. But seeing as how you are a Wilder muppet, enjoy the rematch that no one wants or the fight with Kownacki after that because your idol is a coward

Lol...Why so angry rainbow clown? Just out the pen? What’s going on? Have I touched a nerve. Stop typing bro. Everything you do reveals another layer of your weak arse insecurity.

Who ever I am riding with who the fck cares bumski. Neither of us get paid to win the fight. If this is Anthony Joshua himself then this interaction is truly sad.

Bro... some advice Stop acting like a frustrated man-ape. When the fight happens get your popcorn and if you are lucky maybe your hand will give you some lovin after the fight.

Till then don’t jump at the fire if you can’t take the heat. The education is always free brother... #bumarseloser

[Deus]

Takam was next in line based on what? Politics! The IBF would have sanctioned an Ortiz fight! Hearn wanted no part of anyone tough and lined up Takam as a replacement. Happens all the time in boxing. Again, who did Takam beat to earn that spot? the answer: No one!

Takam was next in line based on the fact that he was ranked 2nd with the IBF September 2017.

The IBF's rules state that if the mandatory challenger pulls out it goes to the next fighter down the list - which was Takam. There's no politics in that... it's the IBF's own rules which are listed on their own site.

Beyond that if Hearn had somehow got the IBF to ignore their own rules he could never have got Ortiz approved because Ortiz was not even in the IBF's rankings at that period of time:

https://www.ibfusbaregistration.com/ibfusba_02APR2014/index.php/ratings/ibf-ratings?view=rankings

I really do not understand why people argue points that can be so easily disproven.

[Scipio2009]

AJ wouldn't be getting that much more. He'd be getting 20% more in a 60/40 split his way.

Wilder should be thankful for that much as he generates nothing really. Showtime are only paying well over the odds due to AJ being around. If he wasn't, Wilder would still be getting 2 Mill a fight as they would see no reason to pay any more than that. AJ has changed that bums life. Well, he wasn't going to change himself now was he? He's not a big enough star to do so on his own so he needs a real star to help him out.

You don't know that, and I don't know that. Which is the same reason why Wilder ended up refusing an offer to sign anything with no actual knowledge of how big the pie will be.

We'll see how big a star Wilder is or isn't in short order. He got a disclosed $2m for the Ortiz fight (if you honestly think that that's the only money Wilder saw on the fight, you're a fool), apparently got almost $15m for the Fury PPV, was said to have gotten something like $10m for the Breazeale fight, is again heading to PPV for Ortiz2, and apparently has a tentative agreement for Fury2 for 2020.

Let's see what the market says about Wilder's starpower.

[Alan Smithee]

Takam was next in line based on the fact that he was ranked 2nd with the IBF September 2017.

The IBF's rules state that if the mandatory challenger pulls out it goes to the next fighter down the list - which was Takam. There's no politics in that... it's the IBF's own rules which are listed on their own site.

Beyond that if Hearn had somehow got the IBF to ignore their own rules he could never have got Ortiz approved because Ortiz was not even in the IBF's rankings at that period of time:

https://www.ibfusbaregistration.com/ibfusba_02APR2014/index.php/ratings/ibf-ratings?view=rankings

I really do not understand why people argue points that can be so easily disproven.

How do you think that he got to #2. Influence by Hearn. How long have you been a boxing fan? Fraudulent rankings have been going on for decades. Some of the most no name clowns have been ranked high based on corruption instead of resume. You claim that Takam was #2 based on earning the spot and not politics. Again, who did Takam defeat to deserve that ranking? Try your best to disprove that point!

[Alan Smithee]

Yes, just like Ortiz who beat 3 bums to get Wilder rematch.

Takam is actually good comparison, Takam is just more proven Ortiz alike fighter.

Takam was more proven? Actually he was less dangerous!

[JakeTheBoxer]

Takam was more proven? Actually he was less dangerous!

Yes, Takam has more experience on world level. Takam`s best win is Thompson, that is second best win of Ortiz.

[Alan Smithee]

Yes, Takam has more experience on world level. Takam`s best win is Thompson, that is second best win of Ortiz.

Carlos Takam? Wow,lol. I go the fights at Turning Stone for the hall of fame weekend's fights every year. Next Friday DeGuardia's Star boxing is promoting. I guess Takam will have a plaque waiting when he retires? The guy is a fu..ing journeyman! You guys are hysterical!

[Alan Smithee]

Yes, Takam has more experience on world level. Takam`s best win is Thompson, that is second best win of Ortiz.

Excatly how old are you Jake? Do you not realize how the fight game works? Rankings are bought and sold. Takam got an inflated ranking and was waiting in the wings because he was a soft touch. I attended the Andrade fight in Boston. Saunders drug tested out and some unknown African dude got the shot. Did he actually deserve it? It's boxing bro! I love the game but it is corruption at it's finest!

[JakeTheBoxer]

I am old enough to know that the best wins of Ortiz are Thompson and Jennings. It is hard even to say Ortiz is top 10.

[Phenom]

Yes, Takam has more experience on world level. Takam`s best win is Thompson, that is second best win of Ortiz.

Just stop it