Don't get me wrong...I think Wilder has no talent but admit he can can hit hard. I actually can't stand him and as you saw Fury totally exposed him for lack of skills. But Breazeale is VERY easy to hit and a guy like Wilder who can punch is going to take him out fast every time. Just my thoughts.
Comments Thread For: Wilder Isn't a Particularly Good Boxer But He's Good Enough
Collapse
-
Fortune favors the bold with betting. Scared money & fanboy money don't make money. And while I'm no JimGunn or Jas, I'm profitable & I'm cool with that.
Look man you probably don't bet as much as I do so you ain't got a clue about this sh^t realllllly. This ain't a win or lose game. Its a ROI game.
It is what it is doe. I'm humble in victory & humble in defeat & don't fanboy on sh^t or hate on mfers over it.Comment
-
I get the logic. I won some nice dough on the Kentucky Derby but lost on the Preakness. Only bet the horse for win/place and he came in third. I always look for "live" dogs but I didn't think Breazeale was one of them. Can't blame you for taking a shot though. If you think the price is right, why not? As long as it's not too much, it makes sense. Wilder does have flaws and with the big guys all it takes is one punch to change things. I had bet on Miller over Joshua but not touching Ruiz,lol!
In boxing most of my profit has been made on live dogs not favorites. In MMA its even more about live dogs cuz there are more live dogs fights. Plus with mainly 3 round/15min fights there is bigger variance with lesser fighters pulling upsets.
Or thats how I've been profitable anyway. I won't act like I know everything & like there aren't other tactics & more profitable ones. And just cats who are better at finding edges than I.Comment
-
Foreman was an ordinary boxer with extraordinary raw power.Comment
Comment