How Fox inflates their ratings

[paulf]

You fking losers with your network wars. Bunch of godamn f@ggots on this forum anymore. Tiresome to come here and see that people don't even talk about the science and how certain fights might go down. Just just bicker about networks and promoters.

Preach. This shit is making me so jaded, man. I know everyone looks at boxing through rose-tinted glasses to whatever era it was when they were in their teens-early twenties, but man.... if feels like the toxicity of the Pacquiao-Mayweather fanboy period has poisoned this era as well.

Call me crazy, but this **** didn't matter 10 years ago.

[N/A]

you’re the only wrestling leotard wearing moron on the site.

How is it supposed to be an insult that I wore wrestling attire when I wrestled? Would you make fun of a bowler for using a bowling ball?

The pbc owned website caught pbc in the act

This site is owned by CBS. Not PBC. Why are you lying about easily verifiable public information?

[killakali]

How is it supposed to be an insult that I wore wrestling attire when I wrestled? Would you make fun of a bowler for using a bowling ball?




This site is owned by CBS. Not PBC. Why are you lying about easily verifiable public information?

pbc paying someone to post here is both laughable and cringeworthy.

The big question we need answered is why does fox run over 60-90 minutes consistently to inflate ratings yet espn doesn’t need to resort to those tactics?

[N/A]

pbc paying someone to post here is both laughable and cringeworthy.

PBC isn't who pays me. The company that pays me isn't currently involved in boxing.

I do know that Matchroom pays people to post here. I do know that Top Rank pays people to post here. I don't know if PBC pays people to post here. They probably don't considering they largely ignore the internet and media.

The big question we need answered is why does fox run over 60-90 minutes consistently to inflate ratings yet espn doesn’t need to resort to those tactics?

Running over doesn't inflate ratings. You have no idea what you're talking about. I already gave you the reasons they run over.

[killakali]

PBC isn't who pays me. The company that pays me isn't currently involved in boxing.

I do know that Matchroom pays people to post here. I do know that Top Rank pays people to post here. I don't know if PBC pays people to post here. They probably don't considering they largely ignore the internet and media.




Running over doesn't inflate ratings. You have no idea what you're talking about. I already gave you the reasons they run over.

nope I already explained why your reasons are lies. Espn doesn’t need to do the same thing to inflate their ratings.

Your obsession with pbc means they pay you or you are one of Al’s ********. There is no other reason for blind faith and unwavering support for the pbc. It’s really bizarre.

[N/A]

nope I already explained why your reasons are lies. Espn doesn’t need to do the same thing to inflate their ratings.

The 8-9 hour did a .3 in the key demo. The 9-10 hour did a .3 in the key demo. The over run isn't factored into that. Had the main event aired on time, that hour would have done a better rating. The rating wasn't helped in any way by the telecast running long. You don't understand how ratings work.

ESPN did a .15 in the key demo.

Ratings are based on a percentage of households who get the channel, so Fox being in more homes is irrelevant. PBC did twice as well as Top Rank in the 18-49 demo. PBC's rating didn't include the over run, Top Rank's did. So it's actually the Top Rank rating that was assisted by people tuning in for Sportscenter.

You have no idea how these things work. You're a troll on the internet. With no experience, knowledge, or insight.

[killakali]

The 8-9 hour did a .3 in the key demo. The 9-10 hour did a .3 in the key demo. The over run isn't factored into that. Had the main event aired on time, that hour would have done a better rating. The rating wasn't helped in any way by the telecast running long. You don't understand how ratings work.

ESPN did a .15 in the key demo.

Ratings are based on a percentage of households who get the channel, so Fox being in more homes is irrelevant. PBC did twice as well as Top Rank in the 18-49 demo. PBC's rating didn't include the over run, Top Rank's did. So it's actually the Top Rank rating that was assisted by people tuning in for Sportscenter.

You have no idea how these things work. You're a troll on the internet. With no experience, knowledge, or insight.

The main event saved this from being a total disaster. It peaked very high but still had a mediocre average. FOX would've been better off putting NASCAR in that timeslot since the race on FS1 actually had higher ratings than PBC. UFC also had a 1% higher rating among younger viewers and the Top Rank card on ESPN was only 16% lower than PBC in the 18-49 demo despite having half as many overall viewers. PBC's audience skews much older than what is typical of combat sports.

[N/A]

The main event saved this from being a total disaster.

You don't understand how ratings work. The main event wasn't included in the rating. Ratings go by hour. Fox did a .3 in 18-49 from 8-9. Fox did a .3 in 18-49 from 9-10. Fox tied ABC and CBS both hours. All three networks did a .3 in 18-49 in both hours. Anything after 10 wasn't included.

NBC had the NHL and won the night. The other three networks tied.

It peaked very high but still had a mediocre average.

In your uneducated, inexperienced, amateur opinion, based on nothing but bias and sexual frustration.

CBS, FOX and ABC all had the same average.

FOX would've been better off putting NASCAR in that timeslot since the race on FS1 actually had higher ratings than PBC.

Nascar costs them 420 million a year. PBC costs them 60 million a year. Nascar better do a higher rating you ****ing fool.

[killakali]

You don't understand how ratings work. The main event wasn't included in the rating. Ratings go by hour. Fox did a .3 in 18-49 from 8-9. Fox did a .3 in 18-49 from 9-10. Fox tied ABC and CBS both hours. All three networks did a .3 in 18-49 in both hours. Anything after 10 wasn't included.

NBC had the NHL and won the night. The other three networks tied.




In your uneducated, inexperienced, amateur opinion, based on nothing but bias and sexual frustration.

CBS, FOX and ABC all had the same average.




Nascar costs them 420 million a year. PBC costs them 60 million a year. Nascar better do a higher rating you ****ing fool.

whoa I seem to have struck a nerve with Al Haymon’s bottom boy. Not only is Haymon a proven ****** lover but u are his min lady boy.

With 1/2 the viewer ESPN was only 16% lower ratings in the key 16-49 demographic. Fox was dead last for ratings behind abc cbs and nbc. Those are facts.

Why must u defend pbc like its your lover? Your obsession is borderline criminal. I may have to report u as a supposedly non bias observer but you are displaying serial killer type tendencies.

Al haymon’s got his schlong rammed so far down your throat that your ability to see the truth is significantly impaired.

NASCAR has more shows than the 22 a year pbc has of course it costs more. this wasn’t even a big race it was on fs1 a chanel based on ratings by pbc cards on fs1 no one watches.

[N/A]

With 1/2 the viewer ESPN was only 16% lower ratings in the key 16-49 demographic.

You're lying. ESPN did a .15. Fox did a .3. ESPN did half the rating in 18-49 as Fox did.

Fox was dead last for ratings behind abc cbs and nbc. Those are facts.

You're lying. Fox, ABC and CBS all tied with a .3 in 18-49.