Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Pacquiao Wanted Best Available Guy in Thurman, Says Gibbons

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    out of Thurman, spence, crawford, thurman is the strongest ww and most proven. Pac would get most respect for beating the proven fighter, not fighter coming off last best win in last fight.
    He has the names in his cv, plus he passed eye test. Crawford and spence have just passed eye test.
    P acs critics ie Floyd fans are making too much of thurman under par performance in last fight? If nel or Ggg had under par performance at 160 in their next fight would Floyd take them on for a 6th title in different weights? Don't think so.
    Last edited by hugh grant; 05-14-2019, 03:43 AM.

    Comment


    • #82
      Best available not named Spence🥊

      Comment


      • #83
        Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
        out of Thurman, spence, crawford, thurman is the strongest ww and most proven. Pac would get most respect for beating the proven fighter, not fighter coming off last best win in last fight.
        He has the names in his cv, plus he passed eye test. Crawford and spence have just passed eye test.
        P acs critics ie Floyd fans are making too much of thurman under par performance in last fight? If nel or Ggg had under par performance at 160 in their next fight would Floyd take them on for a 6th title in different weights? Don't think so.
        Thurman is not the strongest, but definitely the most proven! But out of Thurman, Spence, Crawford, Porter, and Danny Garcia, Thurman had the worst performance! Pac could've fought Crawford a long time ago, and didn't, so we know he's being very careful in his choices! I think Thurman vs. Pacquiao is a GREAT fight, but it is what it is!

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
          out of Thurman, spence, crawford, thurman is the strongest ww and most proven. Pac would get most respect for beating the proven fighter, not fighter coming off last best win in last fight.
          He has the names in his cv, plus he passed eye test. Crawford and spence have just passed eye test.
          P acs critics ie Floyd fans are making too much of thurman under par performance in last fight? If nel or Ggg had under par performance at 160 in their next fight would Floyd take them on for a 6th title in different weights? Don't think so.
          Lol , calls out winner of Spence Garcia and sits ringside, winner says ok lets do it and Manny takes of and picks Thurman who looked like dog sht last fight.

          Dont you get sick of youre own BS, its obvious that Mannys motive is to pick the path of least resistance without fighting a guy coming off a loss, but it might backfire with KT out boxing him.

          Comment


          • #85
            Wont write Thurman off since Williams shut me up & Hurd let me down

            Comment


            • #86
              Originally posted by Roadblock View Post
              Lol , calls out winner of Spence Garcia and sits ringside, winner says ok lets do it and Manny takes of and picks Thurman who looked like dog sht last fight.

              Dont you get sick of youre own BS, its obvious that Mannys motive is to pick the path of least resistance without fighting a guy coming off a loss, but it might backfire with KT out boxing him.
              Spence had to stop his little ass from sneaking out the ring. Puts a poll up and Spence's name isnt even on it.

              Comment


              • #87
                There is a video on youtube where gibbons basically admits they are cherrypicking. The plan is to hang around hoping for a floyd rematch so they are aiming for the least resistance, his words were something like "spence is too young, big and strong, pacquiao is old, he's just running a victory lap". What's funny is people really think thurman is less of a threat than spence, vs spence pacquiao actually had a chance to win.
                Last edited by SplitSecond; 05-14-2019, 06:39 AM.

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by Roadblock View Post
                  Lol , calls out winner of Spence Garcia and sits ringside, winner says ok lets do it and Manny takes of and picks Thurman who looked like dog sht last fight.

                  Dont you get sick of youre own BS, its obvious that Mannys motive is to pick the path of least resistance without fighting a guy coming off a loss, but it might backfire with KT out boxing him.
                  Well, Floyd can claim he could beat Ggg he has no special effects yet don't prove it. That's w orse..
                  Thurman is a great fighter coming off an under par performance.
                  Floyd has a under par performance ag ainst madiana are you implying you'd not have got credit for beating Floyd after floyds controversial win over maidana? Hatton had some under par performances before Floyd beat him does Floyd not deserve credit? If Floyd fought Ggg at 160 after Floyd saw Ggg have an Su b par performance would Floyd not get credit for 6 division titles and beating Ggg when floyds 40 years old with 74 fights under belt?
                  Thurman got all advantages. Floyd ducked him when he was 36 years old. Why isn't thurman being accused of cherry picking pac
                  Last edited by hugh grant; 05-14-2019, 07:36 AM.

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Originally posted by Bronx2245 View Post
                    Thurman is not the strongest, but definitely the most proven! But out of Thurman, Spence, Crawford, Porter, and Danny Garcia, Thurman had the worst performance! Pac could've fought Crawford a long time ago, and didn't, so we know he's being very careful in his choices! I think Thurman vs. Pacquiao is a GREAT fight, but it is what it is!
                    Pac wanted to fight crawford but arum blocked the fight. I think arum isn't confident that crawford can beat a senator from the Philippines.

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Originally posted by Bronx2245 View Post
                      Thurman is not the strongest, but definitely the most proven! But out of Thurman, Spence, Crawford, Porter, and Danny Garcia, Thurman had the worst performance! Pac could've fought Crawford a long time ago, and didn't, so we know he's being very careful in his choices! I think Thurman vs. Pacquiao is a GREAT fight, but it is what it is!
                      if that's the case, why didnt manny fight mikey garcia?? you know, the guy you purposely left out. you know, the guy that had the worst performance out of all the names you mention. yeah, why didnt manny fight mikey garcia then if manny was looking to cherry pick the easiest opponent? yall still cant answer this.......

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP