Losses count less than Floyd fans think. Unbeaten records are treated with su****ion. There are literally hundreds of reasons why a fighter would be unbeaten and skill and ability is lower down.on.list why.
Was it home advantage? Was it draining opponent? Was it opponent wasn't in.prime or had off night? Was you given gift decisions? Was it because you didn't choose toughest opponent available? Maybe you didn't take eno ugh.risks, always gettting things in favour.
Let's face it, very few people think a fighter is unbeaten because they were too good or best of era. People just want to know why and there's countless reasons people will be thinking of like I've just mentioned. An.Unbeaten record isn't an entitlement to anything other than your own ego.
An unbeaten record wasn't a factor in whether Floyd was FOTD so why would it suddenly be an issue when best of era is decided? Pac s a candidate for being Fot d an unprecedented 2 times.
These are the stats that people give a damn about.
Was it home advantage? Was it draining opponent? Was it opponent wasn't in.prime or had off night? Was you given gift decisions? Was it because you didn't choose toughest opponent available? Maybe you didn't take eno ugh.risks, always gettting things in favour.
Let's face it, very few people think a fighter is unbeaten because they were too good or best of era. People just want to know why and there's countless reasons people will be thinking of like I've just mentioned. An.Unbeaten record isn't an entitlement to anything other than your own ego.
An unbeaten record wasn't a factor in whether Floyd was FOTD so why would it suddenly be an issue when best of era is decided? Pac s a candidate for being Fot d an unprecedented 2 times.
These are the stats that people give a damn about.
Comment