ranking higher doesnt technically mean the better boxer, it means accomplishments, etc. floyd's boxing career ended in 2015. while manny, 4 years later at 40 is still continuing on fighting. so IF he ends up beating thurman, spence and crawford. you're telling me that still does nothing for him ranking wise? LOL!!! yall some funny bunnies!
Exactly. But Pac is already greater than Floyd he don't even need to beat thurman. If Pac beats thurman it will surpass any Floyd win alone itself. Because you take into consideration Pac s age and how many fights and war s he's had already. Even Pac s win over broner that is knocking on door of being better than a large majority to most of floyds best wins.
As Pac did it at 40. Floyd not proven he can compete with a bro ner level guy at 40. Brone r is very similar in level and ability to maidana. Pac beat a better bro ner than Madana did
ranking higher doesnt technically mean the better boxer, it means accomplishments, etc. floyd's boxing career ended in 2015. while manny, 4 years later at 40 is still continuing on fighting. so IF he ends up beating thurman, spence and crawford. you're telling me that still does nothing for him ranking wise? LOL!!! yall some funny bunnies!
Floyd's resume is better than Pacquiao's. Period, end of...
actually if you wanna speak resume, pac has the better resume. you should have just stuck with "floyd beat pac already" because then you would have something to stand on lol. bruh you fvvvcked up the moment you brought up resume to compare lol.
actually if you wanna speak resume, pac has the better resume. you should have just stuck with "floyd beat pac already" because then you would have something to stand on lol. bruh you fvvvcked up the moment you brought up resume to compare lol.
But think about it this way. Who does Pacquiao have on his resume that is better than....Pacquiao?
Comment