Does anyone remember when Michael Rosenthal said this about ranking fighters?

[TheCell8]

To quote the great Michael Rosenthal flip flopping bytch azzz himself. So Manny is ranked higher then Floyd despite losses and controversial wins and needing to fight fighters 3 and 4 times to separate himself and still many don't think he ever beat Marquez once. But because he was fighting the best that means more then other guys who were undefeated but not fighting the top guys. But now that Canelo is fighting and beats top elite guy after top guy now the fact that he's not blowing then out means he is not the best while other guys winning but doing it against no where near the same level of competition means they are better? Holy shyt this guy just making up double standards to knock down fighters he just doesn't like. Did it to Floyd for years now uses opposite standard to hate on Canelo. But let's him tell you

Yes, if you're a fan boy or a ******.

Marquez lost to Pacquiao decisively.

Also, Rosenthal is 100% correct regarding the ginger head.

[Mexican_Puppet]

He's either ******, bias with an agenda or racist. It's one of those 3 take your pick fellas. But what he said and used to keep Floyd down and other above him for for years is now opposite of what he is saying today. So which is it does fighting the best matter more then undefeated but I your opinion not fighting the best guys? Hmmm

Because Pacquiao had draws, clear loses, knockout loses and controversial wins and many close fights. There are many that felt his draw and split decision against Marquez was bs and that he lost every fight with Marquez in addition to losing to Morales. He's had multiple rematches, multiple trilogies because of all these close fights while still being being ranked #1 P4P and still fighter of the decade over fighters with more dominate wins and no loses. So elite competition despite so many close fights mattered then. So what changed now?

Exactly.

This is totally ****** and incongruent. And it's totally evident.

And this is an expert and a former writer of the ring?

Lol


How people can accept what this jerk said?

[Redd Foxx]

Having a meltdown and writing crazy long posts because of a journalist's opinion? That's embarrassing. Pull yourself together.

[Mexican_Puppet]

Yes, if you're a fan boy or a ******.

Marquez lost to Pacquiao decisively.

Also, Rosenthal is 100% correct regarding the ginger head.

you are the ******ed

The third fight was very close, more than the fights of Canelo and triple Gay

The first it was very close too

[bigdunny1]

Yes, if you're a fan boy or a ******.

Marquez lost to Pacquiao decisively.

Also, Rosenthal is 100% correct regarding the ginger head.

Even if you think he won which he most definitely did not it was a close fight everyone of them debatable except the last one where Marquez put manny to sleep. lol This clown said Canelo can't be 1 P4p because his fights are close wins while others win decisively. Others who fighting no where near his level and one guy who has a loss to salido. But when Floyd was undefeated and winning more dominate he said I don't care about his dominate wins Manny fights better opponents that's why he's better p4p and fighter of the decade despite losses, draws and contraversal wins and needing multiple trilogies. So did his standard change or did it not?

We get it you still mad Canelo rearanged GGG face and beat the Mexican style out his azzz. But explain to me how he's either not a hypocrite or at worst not a racist?

Because it seems like he is making shyt up on the fly to downgrade black and Mexican fighters he simply don't like.

[Mr.365]

you are the ******ed

The third fight was very close, more than the fights of Canelo and triple Gay

The first it was very close too

Juan Ma Marquez clearly won the 3rd fight. He outclassed & took Pac to school countering him with powershots during the entire fight

Pac won the 1st two

[Mexican_Puppet]

Even if you think he won which he most definitely did not it was a close fight everyone of them debatable except the last one where Marquez put manny to sleep. lol This clown said Canelo can't be 1 P4p because his fights are close wins while others win decisively. Others who fighting no where near his level and one guy who has a loss to salido. But when Floyd was undefeated and winning more dominate he said I don't care about his dominate wins Manny fights better opponents that's why he's better p4p and fighter of the decade despite losses, draws and contraversal wins and needing needing multiple trilogies. So did his standard change or did it not?

We get it you still mad Canelo rearanged GGG face and beat the Mexican style out his azzz. But explain to me how he's either not a hypocrite or at worst not a racist?

Because it seems like he is making shyt up on the fly to downgrade black and Mexican fighters he simply don't like.

Tremendous comment right here

[Mexican_Puppet]

Juan Ma Marquez clearly won the 3rd fight. He outclassed & took Pac to school countering him with powershots during the entire fight

Pac won the 1st two

Of course, but the idi.ot Michael Rosenthal did not care in that case

[bigdunny1]

Having a meltdown and writing crazy long posts because of a journalist's opinion? That's embarrassing. Pull yourself together.

Explain how his stance on Floyd for years putting Manny ahead of him for the same basis he has now flip flopped to hold against Canelo? I'll wait for you to make a logic explaination on this drastic change because he felt Manny was p4p and fighter of the decade despite losses, draws, controversial wins and the excuses was he fighting the best and that means more then just winning against lesser competition. Now that don't hold true anymore? Why are black and Mexican fighters held to these bizarre inconsistent standards from Rosenthal? Meanwhile GGG gained #1 P4p label by beating who by proving what? Had that label before he even fought Jacobs his first top middleweight. Meanwhile black and Mexican need to keep proving and showing more? And the bar just keeps moving and changing.

[sicko]

No Surprise!

It will never be another Bert Sugar that is for sure!