Comments Thread For: Canelo Alvarez is an Excellent Fighter... But Not The Best

[kushking]

Micheal rosencucks last article qoute before this one"Ill admit I was waiting to gift Jacobs ANY close rds so that I can cry Canelo robbed him,but I couldn't give jacobs the fight,I was waiting to cry robbery if it was close"

Is there any doubt remaining that the media has aclear & biased agenda against canelo & in favor of black/white protected espn fighters?

This clown has the audacity to compare lomas weak wins at lower divisions he never belonged fighting in to canelo defeating bigger/better fighters? Loma beating those tiny part timers,is no more impressive than fielding or liam smith/kirkland. Crawford has fought absolutely nobody but part timers & 1 legged gimps.

Lomas 1 truly credible win was against Linares,thats the only win worthy of comparing to nelo. Crawford has 1 good win & a bunch of bcans ranked highly by top rank bribes.

[BeLikeWater]

Sounds like a Haymon payed cuck would say.

[Joe shmo]

[QUOTE=Mexican_Puppet;19734171

Fact: salido is the daddy of Loma[/QUOTE]

I guess that makes Mayweather canelos daddy then

[bigdunny1]

canelo needs to hire lomas and buds matchmakers if he wants to become no 1 P4P...

Nope even if he did that I guarantee these same bias agenda fuelled fools would flip flop and change their criteria. If canelo was fighting guys he had no business being in the ring with like Loma and Crawford doing they would say he's ducking so and so and trash him. He fights the elite best of the best time after time they can't say he's ducking so they say well ok he's winning but created this brand new criteria of well he's not blowing out everyone of them out the water so let's put fighters that are NOT fighting the best ahead of him. Hell let's out a dude who already list to a man with double digits losses and had tanks leftovers phuk his face up and the man who journeyman Can just iced in 1 round after dropping and almost beating Loma ahead.

In any other sport they all do these power ranking which is all based in who you think is best and if they played against each would win. In every other sport Canelo would be number 1 no debate hell he would of been number 1 before Jacobs. But this is boxing where these writers make it up as they go and change their own rules as they go. Same writers REFUSED to vote Floyd best of last decade and voted Manny instead on the basis that they felt Manny despite losses, despite close wins needing rematches and trilogies to prove he was better fought better competition then Floyd. Floyd who was DOMINATING his fights and had zero losses but they screwed him saying Manny was fighting better comp....same writers now saying the opposite and dominating lesser comp is better lol

Boxing writers are some jealous bitter, agenda based females. What they doing to keep canelo out of #1 P4P is exactly what they did to keep Floyd from winning fighter if the decade and no matter what he did found some angle to bash his career and take whatever shine they could off it.

[Joe shmo]

Micheal rosencucks last article qoute before this one"Ill admit I was waiting to gift Jacobs ANY close rds so that I can cry Canelo robbed him,but I couldn't give jacobs the fight,I was waiting to cry robbery if it was close"

Is there any doubt remaining that the media has aclear & biased agenda against canelo & in favor of black/white protected espn fighters?

This clown has the audacity to compare lomas weak wins at lower divisions he never belonged fighting in to canelo defeating bigger/better fighters? Loma beating those tiny part timers,is no more impressive than fielding or liam smith/kirkland. Crawford has fought absolutely nobody but part timers & 1 legged gimps.

Lomas 1 truly credible win was against Linares,thats the only win worthy of comparing to nelo. Crawford has 1 good win & a bunch of bcans ranked highly by top rank bribes.

What about grj??? He's considered the best in his division and Loma fought him in his 3rd fight after coming off a loss. Who was canelos 3rd fight with??

[juandabomb]

the truth hurts canelistas, the guy doesnt show domination vs top level fights. he squeaks by and some cards are shady as fudge

[bigdunny1]

I don't even believe it's a fact that Manny fought better competition then Floyd did but these same flip floping writers used that as justification that fighting and losing to better guys or close fights yiu won that need rematches and trilogies is better then Floyd dominating but in their opinion lesser quality opponents is how they decided Manny was better fighter of the decade now same writers saying canelo definitely fighting and beating higher competition but not blowing them out is not enough to be number fighter for them. Totsl opposite. Think about that and remember the standard these cowards used in the past to rank fighters and most notable to screw Floyd? If you don't see the bias you just don't want to see it.

[lizard_man]

Crawford almost got stopped by a much smaller opponent, Gamboa, who actually fights like a less skilled version of Canelo in some ways, so if Crawford and Canelo were the same size, I could see that being Canelo's first signature KO of a top name his size.

If Loma was Canelo's size, well yeah, that would be like 12 rounds or less of the worst rounds Canelo had against Lara, multiplied times five. There's nothing in Lomachenko's career except Salido that would suggest a Canelo his size would give him any trouble, and remember, Salido was not his size. The whole reason Salido gave Lomachenko trouble was the 10 pound weight advantage. So yeah, a 10 pound bigger Canelo might trouble Loma too, if it was Loma's 2nd pro fight, first ever 12 round fight, and the ref let Canelo foul all night, but even then, Salido is the southpaw expert, Canelo isn't, Salido is a pressure fighter, Canelo has become more of one lately but... you get the point.

If Canelo was actually the same size as Loma though, no one weighing Loma's weight in the ring has really even won a round against him his entire career. Maybe Pedraza won 1 round against him or something but that wasn't a 100% Loma and we don't know if Pedraza didn't have a big weight advantage over Loma too. That fight was at 135 and that's not Loma's natural weight.

Instead of thinking about Canelo vs Loma if both were 160, instead picture a 130 pounder version of Canelo fighting Loma at 130. Would it even be competitive? IMO no.

Crawford on the other hand, the way he struggled with Gamboa and Burns, the way Benavidez and even Jeff Horn were clipping him with big shots, the way Crawford looked so uncomfortable in the ring vs Postol, there are lots of reasons from his career to believe that a 140 pounder Canelo vs a 140 pounder Crawford would KO Crawford. Crawford is no Loma. He might be a better athlete, faster longer etc, but Crawford "only" has top 20 or top 30 skills for his era, Loma has possibly top 20 or top 30 skills all time. That's a big difference. Of course, Loma doesn't have Crawford's reach, so there are pros and cons to each, but I think ATG skills with a short reach still trumps a great reach without ATG skills, probably by a long shot.

Wow. Dude you need to take those rose colored shades off. I think you're the biggest loma dlck rider in existence. Nothing you say will ever change the fact that lomachenko got his azz handed to him by salido.

Lomachenko lost to salido no matter how you try to slice it.

[Robbie Barrett]

So the article writer holds up Canelo's resume and tears it apart and then holds up two fighters that have far inferior resumes as being better. Article writer is a moron. Who you beat >>>>> looking good against B and C competition.

[kushking]

What about grj??? He's considered the best in his division and Loma fought him in his 3rd fight after coming off a loss. Who was canelos 3rd fight with??

Age is more pertinent in that comparison than how many fights they had. Canelos been fighting pro grown men since age 15. Loma went pro in mid 20s so of course he started vs tougher opponents,hes a 2x gold 🥇🥇medalist ffs.

Loma had no business ever fighting anyone below natural 130 lbers just as canelo had no business fighting ww's,Lomas an excellent fighter as is Crawford,but its absolutely laughable to act like Canelos resume is inferior like this writer tries to. I can see someone saying they're above canelo because of the eyeball test,but to act like he doesn't have the current best wins in boxing is a joke. Even still the eyeball test being main basis of ranking him below p4p#1 is like these writers moving the goalposts as they go along to facilitate bias.

I DO give loma credit for all his wins & those were solid wins for him at that stage,but to compare them to beating or even fighting guys like Lara/Trout/Ggg/Jacobs is disengenious at best, because lomas & esp.crawfords best wins warent truly proven vs anyone elite,they were solid wins on the level of other beltholders who hadn't truly broken out yet.