Originally posted by sicko
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Hearn Explains Why WBC Was Wrong To Order Loma-Campbell
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Phenom View PostYou can't unify a vacant belt unification is two champions fighting
My understanding is that unification is about having the belts, not how you got them.
The WBC seem to be looking at this as a unification.
Where is this concept of there needing to be two champions fighting for unification coming from?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ajvar View Post
It was AJ who disagreed to fight Klit unless there is a vacant belt for it. Stop twisting reality. At best they both set same ultimatum.
https://www.boxingscene.com/klitschk...joshua--109870
Comment
-
Originally posted by T.M.T View PostI don’t like Hearnia but I see his point. Why isn’t loma in the 4 fighter tournament to earn the dam WBC title?
Not unless you think Loma belongs at the same breath as those 4
Comment
-
I don’t have a problem with the matchup. I do have a problem with Loma already having so many title shots in his first 15 fights though. He actually got a title shot (that he lost btw) in his second fight. Most guys have 18-20 fights under their belts before they get their first shot. I feel like he is given a lot, and is severely overrated.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fabes88 View PostI’m twisting? That’s exactly what you are doing but go off. There’s the article as proof although I’m sure you’ll find some way to still disagree.
https://www.boxingscene.com/klitschk...joshua--109870Last edited by Ajvar; 05-12-2019, 01:19 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fabes88 View PostHearn didn’t actively partition for that fight to be for the belt that was down to klitchko. That’s what it took to make the biggest fight of that year and I’m not mad at that. It also didn’t involve the wba breaking their own rule about having to make two mandatory defences after winning a vacant title.
Comment
-
This is no different that the time the VACANT WBA title was on the line and AJ was allowed to fight for it. Wald petitioned the WBA to sanction the fight and at first they said no. Then an additional 10k seats were added to Wembley Stadium and then they approved the petition. Mendoza had the power to say no to the petition but he said yes. The WBO however, wasn't having the shenanigans.
They held a 4 man tourney to determine their champ which is how Parker got the belt. What should have happened with the WBA is this; the Number 1 (Ortiz) should have fought Wlad (number 2). But Wlad didn't want to fight Ortiz. At that point, the WBA should have told Wlad, "you can fight AJ, but not for this here title. No no sir". This would have Ortiz a chance to fight for the title. And this is why Hearn is pissed at the WBC concerning Whyte.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fabes88 View PostHearn didn’t actively partition for that fight to be for the belt
Comment
Comment