Truth of Myth: 'Wilder is avoiding Joshua' ?
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Everything I said is true. It's public knowledge that only the first two years are guaranteed. It's public knowledge the deal was done before Skipper was hired. It's public knowledge the Golden Boy deal was Skipper's baby. It's public knowledge that Canelo is the biggest star in US boxing. It's public knowledge that Hearn was unable to get many, if any, PBC stars to jump, despite promising DAZN he could land most of them.
Is DAZN going to keep giving Hearn 100 million a year just to be nice?
Everything you wrote on this site is barely 20% true.
Am only amazed how you come up with these BS defences and try to coin it to be true. That I will give it to you.Comment
-
Comment
-
I understand that you're insulting me personally, but you couldn't refute a single thing I said.
Everyone called me the village idiot when I insisted HBO would leave boxing. I was right.
Everyone called me the village idiot when I insisted PBC would get a network to give them at least 50 million a year when the time buys ended. I was right.
In a village of idiots, the wise man is often treated as the idiot. Nothing new.Comment
-
Wilder and Joshua were both with Showtime. Showtime put up the money Joshua asked for. Joshua refuses and moves to DAZN, even though his promoter swears he has no deal with DAZN.
Meanwhile, all Wilder wants is to maximize the pot so both fighters make more.
If Joshua, who doesn't have a deal with DAZN, and had been fighting on Showtime for many fights, refuses to do the fight on PPV, demanding that he and Wilder both make less on DAZN, Wilder has every right to tell him to **** off.
Mind you, showtime didn't put up any damn money. BTsport did accept to bring major part of the 50mil.
Stop selling this fake news repeatedly to vulnerable casuals.Comment
-
Haymon doesn't talk publicly. He could make 50 offers and if Hearn claims on IFL he hasn't made any offers, that's what fans will believe.
The truth is that Hearn and Finkel/Haymon have had talks off and on for years and continue to have talks now. Hearn has received numerous offers, including a 2 fight 120 million deal to fight Wilder twice on Showtime, as a counter to DAZN's 4 fight 120 million deal for Wilder. Hearn has been very clear. The fight can only happen on DAZN.
Will Hearn say that on IFL? No. Why would he? He can typically lie with impunity. He knows Haymon won't respond. When Espinoza actually posted proof that Hearn was lying about the fight being on Sky, Hearn just plays dumb about the meaning of the word "contract" and all the AJ fans fall for it.
The Wilder side is done with the PR battle. They've accepted AJ's fans will believe anything. So they're going in a different direction for now. Hoping to get a Fury rematch in the first half of next year, and hoping DAZN cancels their Matchroom deal so Joshua might fight Wilder on Showtime PPV at the end of next year.
You are damn insane manh, I give it to you.
Have never seen any lier above you. Big ups.Comment
-
Comment
-
Biggest issue is this.
Only the first two years of Hearn's DAZN deal are guaranteed.
Hearn struck that deal before John Skipper took over and before DAZN signed Golden Boy.
Why does DAZN need to pay a UK promoter a ton of money to build their US business when they already have the biggest star in US boxing?
Skipper would have NEVER signed that Matchroom deal and Hearn knows it. Hearn's best chance of proving his worth to DAZN is delivering Joshua vs. Wilder. If he can't deliver that, he's in serious jeopardy of DAZN opting out of the final six years of the deal.
That is why the fight hasn't happened. Hearn will only allow the fight to happen on DAZN, but Wilder knows the fight would make way more on PPV. Why should Wilder take less so Hearn can rescue his DAZN deal? Why not wait it out and let Hearn lose the DAZN deal, forcing Hearn to make the fight on PPV like Wilder wants.Comment
Comment