There is nothing 'great' about canelo or his performance last night.....

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • FeFist
    No.1
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jun 2008
    • 9252
    • 576
    • 357
    • 29,695

    #61
    When Spence beat up Garcia, people were quick to point out the physical disadvantages that come with being a shorter fighter with a shorter reach.

    Canelo demonstrated why it is a matter of skill. Great head movement, great selection of punches.

    He thoroughly controlled the first half of the fight and did what he needed to in the second. I personally had him winning 8 rounds to 4.

    Comment

    • Lomadeaux
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jan 2017
      • 7658
      • 848
      • 120
      • 133,607

      #62
      Originally posted by BoxingIsGreat
      I gave Jacobs 2 rounds vs Canelo. That fight wasn't even close. I had Jacobs beating GGG.
      If this is right then you gave Canelo 3 rounds in the first fight and 4 or 5 in the second?

      Comment

      • Raggamuffin
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Aug 2016
        • 8210
        • 457
        • 966
        • 43,263

        #63
        Originally posted by champion4ever
        I say that because Jacobs have been dropped and stopped before in his career. In addition, it's the reason why I believe Golden Boy was comfortable in selecting him as Canelo's next opponent, in order to showcase his skills because they saw Danny as potentially vulnerable.
        Jacobs hasn't shown that he’s vulnerable in a long time. He went after a title and won. There’s one left and we will see if he goes after that one.

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP