Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

DAZN should fire Chris Mannix. He talks like a casual.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Chris Mannix is like the herpes virus, he just needs to be gone.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by chaosisme View Post
      LOL f.uck off guy. If you think Canelo is anywhere near the skill level of Lomachenko, you're the casual.
      Lomachenko lost to Orlando Salido, an Uber driver.

      Canelo lost to Floyd Mayweather Jr., the best to EVER do it.

      Done.

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by Kezzer View Post
        I could easily argue he isn’t as skilled as either of those opponents, in fact many have them above Canelo P4P. People will have different opinions.

        I personally think both are more skilled but Canelo has more power which can make him more effective. That said, you can argue GGG beat him in both fights and certainly the first one. I think the odds tonight heavily favour him and I think if he beats Jacobs tonight that may change our view on just how good (or not) Canelo is!
        I CHALLENGE you to name one opponent on Crawford or Loma's resume that comes anywhere close to Miguel Cotto. Just ONE.

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by revelated View Post
          Troll?

          He just said Canelo is the champion without having the belts because he beat Cotto, who beat Sergio, who beat Pavlik, who beat Taylor, who beat Hopkins, who was undisputed.

          That's NOT the way it works!!
          That was Brian Kenny, not Mannix. Kenny knows his boxing pretty well. He said that because Canelo is the lineal champ, by virtue of that lineage.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by Boxing1013 View Post
            That was Brian Kenny, not Mannix. Kenny knows his boxing pretty well. He said that because Canelo is the lineal champ, by virtue of that lineage.
            So he's lineal for that, but Tyson Fury isn't?

            Come on man.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by revelated View Post
              So he's lineal for that, but Tyson Fury isn't?

              Come on man.
              I have to assume you're trolling at this point because I'm lost lol. Fury is lineal as well. You hear Fury saying all the time that he is the real champ at HW.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by revelated View Post
                I CHALLENGE you to name one opponent on Crawford or Loma's resume that comes anywhere close to Miguel Cotto. Just ONE.
                Cotto lost six fights. I’m not suggesting he’s a poor fighter but clearly FIVE others also best him. You don’t therefore become the most skilled fighter by defeating him. Therefore there really is no need to answer your silly question, won’t responding again as your clearly either heavily bias towards Canelo or simply trolling otherwise you would easily recognize that other people can have opinions.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by Boxing1013 View Post
                  I have to assume you're trolling at this point because I'm lost lol. Fury is lineal as well. You hear Fury saying all the time that he is the real champ at HW.
                  I agree he's lineal. NSB does not.

                  And by this logic mind you, Terence Crawford must be lineal, because he beat Horn, who became lineal when he beat Manny, who was lineal. Right?


                  Originally posted by Kezzer View Post
                  Cotto lost six fights. I’m not suggesting he’s a poor fighter but clearly FIVE others also best him. You don’t therefore become the most skilled fighter by defeating him. Therefore there really is no need to answer your silly question, won’t responding again as your clearly either heavily bias towards Canelo or simply trolling otherwise you would easily recognize that other people can have opinions.
                  I know he lost six fights. That should tell you where I rank Crawford and Loma's opponents - because a 2015 twilight of career Cotto blows them all out.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by revelated View Post
                    I agree he's lineal. NSB does not.

                    And by this logic mind you, Terence Crawford must be lineal, because he beat Horn, who became lineal when he beat Manny, who was lineal. Right?




                    I know he lost six fights. That should tell you where I rank Crawford and Loma's opponents - because a 2015 twilight of career Cotto blows them all out.
                    Lol I didn't say I co-sign that assessment. I don't think trinkets dictate who the top man is. And that's basically what Kenny was saying as well - that belts don't matter - although he also said the opposite of that too by touting the lineal title lol.

                    I have my own opinions about who is top dog at each weight...by performance etc.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP