Comments Thread For: Dillian Whyte: I Think The WBC is Protecting Deontay Wilder

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • N/A
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jul 2017
    • 9269
    • 214
    • 0
    • 12

    #41
    Originally posted by Sid-Knee
    Yep, nothing the WBC or Haymon does is shady. Haha.
    I dare you to have a real adult conversation. Don't be a troll. Talk to me like a human. If you think the WBC or Haymon has done something shady here, tell me what they did. No need for vague sarcasm to hide the fact that you don't have a position. If you have a position, just tell me and we can discuss it.


    The WBC called for an eliminator when Whyte was taking a bigger fight for more money against Chisora. Plus, Whyte has already said that Ortiz and his side turned down a big money offer for the fight. after what they did with AJ, I can see this being the case.

    Whyte turned down the eliminator for the IBF for 2 reasons. 1) Whyte could get a fight with AJ any time he wanted anyway. 2) A bigger fight for more money against a higher ranking fighter at home was on offer over taking on Pulev for less in Bulgaria.
    If you want to list all the excuses for why he's refused to fight a final eliminator, fine, but you can't then act like the WBC or IBF is doing something shady by not naming him mandatory. He absolutely refuses to fight to become the mandatory. He wants to become mandatory by attrition, which was deemed illegal by the federal government.

    Comment

    • _Rexy_
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jan 2018
      • 27934
      • 6,140
      • 3,585
      • 358,040

      #42
      Originally posted by Eff Pandas
      I mean really think about the situation doe. Just don't fanboy for or against mfers.

      Why didn't Breazeale pull Ortiz? Cuz Breazeale ain't beating Ortiz. Eric Molina didn't deserve to be in a eliminator at f#cking all.

      Maybe I just missed Ortiz or Whyte turning down a mando fight with Breazeale. But to me it seems like WBC Guy wanted Breazeale to be the mando cuz Molina shouldn't have been in the running. Thats all I'm saying. Ortiz is on his own with his current situation & Whyte is on his own for turning down the mando fight.
      The final eliminator was originally Stiverne/Breazele with Ortiz fighting Wilder. That’s when Ortiz pissed hot and Wilder/Stiverne II was made on short notice.

      Pretty sure Whyte was offered the final eliminator shot because he was ranked and he turned it down. Said it was too short notice
      Last edited by _Rexy_; 05-03-2019, 11:54 PM.

      Comment

      • TexasCowBoy
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jun 2016
        • 2042
        • 65
        • 5
        • 25,845

        #43
        We Be Corrupt (WBC) is based in Mexico....Mexico is corrupt to the gills.......

        Comment

        • Corbett
          Banned
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Jan 2015
          • 339
          • 10
          • 0
          • 11,159

          #44
          Of course the WBC are protecting Wilder he has had only 1 mandatory fight in over 4 1/2 years that’s a disgrace

          Comment

          • Toffee
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Oct 2018
            • 7204
            • 2,489
            • 74
            • 62,824

            #45
            Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
            This is a great example of fans (and fighters) falling for Hearn's propaganda.

            Whyte has never fought a final eliminator. He's turned down multiple final eliminators from both the WBC and the IBF. This is why he's not a mandatory. It's very simple.

            The WBC did nothing shady here. Stiverne vs Breazeale was a final eliminator. Ortiz failed a test, Stiverne moved to the main event and Breazeale faced the highest available contender. Whyte was offered the fight, but turned it down. Just one of many final eliminators he's turned down.
            You leave out the bit that happened in the past few months.

            The WBC ordered a Breazeale v Whyte fight for the interim title. He declined a big Joshua fight. They then ordered Wilder v Breazeale.

            Maybe they never said it was a final eliminator, just an interim title fight between their mandatory and silver champ. But realistically if Whyte beat Breazeale they weren't about to immediately order Breazeale as a mandatory. They'd look ridiculous.

            So he's got a case? He made decisions based on an order they backtracked on. Those decisions cost him millions.

            Does it come back to that weird ordering of Fury v Wilder II when they had already sanctioned it? Let's be honest, they were doing so much strange stuff in the past 6 months that they were going to get sued by someone.

            Comment

            • Ray*
              Be safe!!!
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jul 2005
              • 44867
              • 1,654
              • 1,608
              • 558,890

              #46
              Took you this long to realise this?

              Comment

              • Throwingbombs
                Contender
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • Jul 2009
                • 416
                • 31
                • 3
                • 13,944

                #47
                So tell me what Brezeale was ordered to do by the WBC to become mandatory? Was he ordered to be in a final eliminator against a top contender like Ortiz or Pulev in Bulgaria? Had he even earned a shot by beating the likes of a Parker or Chisora? Hell know he wasnt made to jump through any difficult hoops.

                You know that fat bum Stiverne? How did your crooked organisation make him mandatory? He lost the title against Wilder fought one bum in the mean time and all of a sudden he is mandatory again? Are you kidding me? Where is his tough final eliminator? How the hell has that happened.

                You cannot accept your corrupt leader accepts bribes from the PBC and wraps Wilder in cotton wool and let's him do as he pleases. There is a reason why everyone thinks the WBC is corrupt and your propaganda wont change that.

                Comment

                • Kcvtr81
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • May 2017
                  • 987
                  • 32
                  • 67
                  • 17,488

                  #48
                  C'mon now Suilaman is legit,,,,,, hahahah

                  Comment

                  • N/A
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jul 2017
                    • 9269
                    • 214
                    • 0
                    • 12

                    #49
                    Originally posted by Toffee
                    You leave out the bit that happened in the past few months.

                    The WBC ordered a Breazeale v Whyte fight for the interim title. He declined a big Joshua fight. They then ordered Wilder v Breazeale.

                    Maybe they never said it was a final eliminator, just an interim title fight between their mandatory and silver champ. But realistically if Whyte beat Breazeale they weren't about to immediately order Breazeale as a mandatory. They'd look ridiculous.

                    So he's got a case? He made decisions based on an order they backtracked on. Those decisions cost him millions.
                    Even if that was Whyte's position, he'd still have to fight a final eliminator. When Breazeale lost out on the Stiverne fight through no fault of his own, he didn't demand to be named mandatory. He demanded to face the highest rated available contender in a final eliminator. That request was granted.

                    When Fury signed with ESPN three months ago, costing Whyte his final eliminator against Breazeale, he could have demanded to face the highest available contender in a final eliminator. The WBC would have granted that request.

                    The problem is that Whyte didn't demand that. He demanded to be named mandatory. Over and over he does everything possible to avoid a final eliminator. He wants to be gifted the mandatory position.

                    Comment

                    • Toffee
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Oct 2018
                      • 7204
                      • 2,489
                      • 74
                      • 62,824

                      #50
                      By the way, he claims not to have heard from the WBC but Hearn said the other day that they've received the WBC's ruling and don't accept it. He also said that Whyte wanted to go all in on the WBC but that he was stopping him (a threat?). This looks like the start of Whyte giving up on the WBC and instead trying to embarrass them.

                      You've got to feel for Dillian.

                      Number one with the WBC. Can't get a title shot.

                      Number one with the WBO. Usyk moves up in weight to take the mandatory.

                      Effectively number one active fighter in the WBA. You'd need a degree in engineering to understand who gets the title shot for that belt!

                      Basically he's fcuked now. His only chance at getting his shot is to take less money than previously offered for Joshua.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP