Comments Thread For: Rolls Admits on Golovkin: I've Got Mount Everest Ahead of Me!

[bigdunny1]

lol at fielding being a world class fighter. He got smashed in one round by smith. he's worse than rolls IDGAF what corrupt rankings or fake belts say.. get your tongue out of clenelo's PED infested ass.

Got KO'd by a elite fighter means you can't be a world class fighter? Ok then GGG's best 2 wins were against non world class fighters. Because Jacobs and Lemieux were both knocked out years before GGG ever fought them and neither were knocked out by a elite fighter. What besides Fielding losing to the best 168lber in the world makes him worse then Rolls? Fielding has a half dozen wins against fighters better then Rolls and rebounded from a loss early his career to win a world title and become top 10 ranked by everybody. Meanwhile Rolls is old a a phuk been fighting for a decade and has no wins over even a top 80 ranked fighter. he himself is only ranked 96th. Again those rankings have nothing to do with alphabelt rankings. So how is boxrec corrupt by ranking Fielding top 10 and Rolls 96th they have nothing to do with promoters or belt orgs.

The point isn't that Fielding is a elite fighter because he's not it's that he is EASILY way better then Rolls. Let's make a poll wait one already exists....

https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=812253

[BoxingIsGreat]

What a waste of time and money for both of them!

Don't know how much Mr. Rolls is making but, for GGG, it's not a waste of time, at all, it's an 8-figure payday, if what has been reported about his contract with DAZN is true.

Good money fight for them.

[Mindgames]

of course he is he held a world title. And I'm not talking about alphabet rankings (which are for sure are influenced by promoters) I'm talking 3rd party unbiased rankings. Boxrec, RING, ESPN you name any ranking you trust and Fielding was in their top 10 rankings for 168. Rolls isn't listed on any rankings and if you look at boxrec he's listed as the 96th best 160lber. He simply isn't a world class fighter and he hasn't even faced a top 80 ranked fighter at any point in his decade long boxing career. You can hate Fielding all you want but he was universally top 10 ranked and was a world champion those are facts. He's got numerous wins against fighters BETTER then Rollls. Rolls is a bum who is almost as old as GGG and right now is the highest he's ever been ranked, he's never been a world class fighter. Saying 2 fighters are the same when 1 is a world champ and top 10 ranked and his only loss was to a elite fighter and the other guy is ranked 96th is a joke. Rolls ha been fighting mostly guys who are not even 100 ranked in the world and almost all his fighters were never televised.

Fielding won his belt against Tyrone Zeuge who you call a bum but even after the loss is still top 25 ranked 168lber in the world today. He was top 15 ranked when Fielding fought him. I'll repeat it if these guys are bums then what does that make Rolls when these guys are BETTER fighters then Rolls and have each beaten fighters better then Rolls. Stop trying to make a false equivalent that this bum is just like Rocky. Their resume and accomplishes are not the same. The point isn't that Rocky is some elite fighter he isn't but he is a world class fighter and much better then Rolls. Honestly this bum is way worse then Vanes and GGG was killed rightfully so for that fight. Vanes was small and inactive coming off losses but he was a world class fighter at 154 atleast. This bum has never been world class at any point and 35 years old.

Rocky isnt world class because hes beaten nobody who is world class. He has a big time promoter and sells tickets, which is why he was steered into a title fight that equally talented fighters would never have had the opportunity to get. I dont call fighters bums ever, by Zeuge has no wins against anyone world class either. Rocky had one fight with a world class fighter and couldn't get out of the first round. Rocky Fielding is a popular man,and having boxed abit id never call a fighter names, its a hard game. But he was a British level domestic fighter whos sells tickets and thats the only reason he was anywhere near Canelo. Liam Smith was similar. Nobody of note on hes record and has done nothing at world level since.At least he hadn't been beaten in a round already though. I say it as i see it, not because ive got some personal feelings towards certain fighters.

[Smash]

u wont freeze to death if you reach the top

[wileyhemi]

Don't know how much Mr. Rolls is making but, for GGG, it's not a waste of time, at all, it's a 10-figure payday, if what has been reported about his contract with DAZN is true.
Good money fight for them.

Who'd 'a thunk a fighter could make $1,000,000,000 for a couple of rounds against a top 100 stiff

[BoxingIsGreat]

Who'd 'a thunk a fighter could make $1,000,000,000 for a couple of rounds against a top 100 stiff

I meant 8. I corrected it. Thanks for pointing it out to me.

[TonyGe]

Rocky isnt world class because hes beaten nobody who is world class. He has a big time promoter and sells tickets, which is why he was steered into a title fight that equally talented fighters would never have had the opportunity to get. I dont call fighters bums ever, by Zeuge has no wins against anyone world class either. Rocky had one fight with a world class fighter and couldn't get out of the first round. Rocky Fielding is a popular man,and having boxed abit id never call a fighter names, its a hard game. But he was a British level domestic fighter whos sells tickets and thats the only reason he was anywhere near Canelo. Liam Smith was similar. Nobody of note on hes record and has done nothing at world level since.At least he hadn't been beaten in a round already though. I say it as i see it, not because ive got some personal feelings towards certain fighters.

Khan a much smaller man who had been knocked out and hurt badly numerous times prior to fighting Canelo lasted longer than Fielding. Smith lasted longer. Chavez who is not a great fighter outlasted Fielding. These guys lose reason when they talk about Canelo.

[kushking]

Khan a much smaller man who had been knocked out and hurt badly numerous times prior to fighting Canelo lasted longer than Fielding. Smith lasted longer. Chavez who is not a great fighter outlasted Fielding. These guys lose reason when they talk about Canelo.

Triangle theories mean nothing in boxing. Brook outlasted stevens & others vs ggg too.

[kushking]

lol at fielding being a world class fighter. He got smashed in one round by smith. he's worse than rolls IDGAF what corrupt rankings or fake belts say.. get your tongue out of clenelo's PED infested ass.

Its laughable that your this level of hypocritically ******ed,you didn't even know rolls existed before your idol cherrypicked him from the local salvation army ffs

Only a straight up cuck would say rolls is better than a former beltholder. (Hes 35 & had only one 10 rd fight)


Why is rolls better than anyone let alone fielding? "Duuuur I don't know, because ggg cherrypicked him,duuuuur"

Funny how your ALWAYS crying that everyone isn't on their knees blowing lomachenko for his mediocre wins like you do,& here you are calling fielding a mega bum for getting kod in 1 rd by the best,but when loma got dropped & almost beat by a glassjaw linares whos been kod by megabums & got kod in 1 rd in his next fight after loma by a megabum; Suddenly hes ultra elite doe huh? Suddenly it doesn't matter that you say getting kod in 1 rd by the best makes you a bum, suddenly it makes you p4p #1




Ftr fielding WAS a no hoper,but many thousands of levels above rolls.

[mapleleaf27]

of course he is he held a world title. And I'm not talking about alphabet rankings (which are for sure are influenced by promoters) I'm talking 3rd party unbiased rankings. Boxrec, RING, ESPN you name any ranking you trust and Fielding was in their top 10 rankings for 168. Rolls isn't listed on any rankings and if you look at boxrec he's listed as the 96th best 160lber. He simply isn't a world class fighter and he hasn't even faced a top 80 ranked fighter at any point in his decade long boxing career. You can hate Fielding all you want but he was universally top 10 ranked and was a world champion those are facts. He's got numerous wins against fighters BETTER then Rollls. Rolls is a bum who is almost as old as GGG and right now is the highest he's ever been ranked, he's never been a world class fighter. Saying 2 fighters are the same when 1 is a world champ and top 10 ranked and his only loss was to a elite fighter and the other guy is ranked 96th is a joke. Rolls ha been fighting mostly guys who are not even 100 ranked in the world and almost all his fighters were never televised.

Fielding won his belt against Tyrone Zeuge who you call a bum but even after the loss is still top 25 ranked 168lber in the world today. He was top 15 ranked when Fielding fought him. I'll repeat it if these guys are bums then what does that make Rolls when these guys are BETTER fighters then Rolls and have each beaten fighters better then Rolls. Stop trying to make a false equivalent that this bum is just like Rocky. Their resume and accomplishes are not the same. The point isn't that Rocky is some elite fighter he isn't but he is a world class fighter and much better then Rolls. Honestly this bum is way worse then Vanes and GGG was killed rightfully so for that fight. Vanes was small and inactive coming off losses but he was a world class fighter at 154 atleast. This bum has never been world class at any point and 35 years old.

how many hours a week are you in the gym? so disgusting to hear boxing "fans" call boxer's bums??? They risk their lives for [ mostly] small paychecks and for our entertainment...who the F have you beat? According to you there are all these bums out there, have you beat any of them?...have you ever ran 5k a day and then did gym work and sparring for a 6 week camp??? Take a break man, Steve Rolls would put you in a coma