Comments Thread For: Khan: The Fight Was 100% Turning, Crawford Was Slowing Down

[kingdruid]

Khan is the Trump of boxing, where the **** is his mind to come up with the **** he comes up with. I don't know why they keep giving this guy chances, he (chin)chokes whenever he is put up against a good fighter.

[muslimer12]

Just stop khan......

[HeadBodyBodyBody]

Bad look from Khan

At one point I thought the guy was just unlucky but it is now hard to deny that he is a tool

[angkag]

Was the blow low? Yes, but partly due to Khan holding down on Crawford's head.

Was the blow to the nuts? NO, it was clearly on the upper thigh/lower hip area.

Did Khan use it as a way out? Yes.

I wonder if anyone remembers the end of the Judah fight with Khan, where he ended the fight on a low blow while pushing Judah's head down? The guy is a delusional sack of ****. He knows now how it feels to be on the receiving end of a low blow. Shoving another boxer's head down with your forearm is as much of a foul as a low blow.

There are two fights that are a must-watch to see how low blows can affect fights, and how certain referees officiate them (or don't, to be more accurate).

1. Agbeko v Mares
- this is the gold standard. Non-stop low blows from Mares, then he cracks Agbeko square in the nuts at one point and Agbeko goes down, just as you think the ref sends Mares to the corner to deduct a point...nope...he starts giving Agbeko a 10 count. If you haven't seen it, its a must see.

2. Loma v Salido
- sorry Loma, just the silver medal this time, but still in the low-blow Hall of Fame

Main point being that you see both Loma and Agbeko taking endless low blows and they keep going - just took Khan one and he couldn't continue.......

[sterilizer]

Dont forget how he was schooling Canelo and winning every round easily

until he got caught by a lucky punch from ginger, doe

That is utterly ridiculous.

No "schooling" at all (sorry but that's a ****** comment).

No "lucky punch" at all. (A very smart faint blow to the body, to set up a brutal face punch, a Canelo trademark move).

No "winning every round easily" yet another ****** comment. Khan won maybe the 1st round "easily" --flashy face punches, that was it-- but from there on, since the 2nd round, Canelo was flattening Khan with brutal body punches, and actually winning every single round after the 1st, give or take the 2nd maybe. Just the 1st round was won "clearly" by Khan, that's it.

I am ready for an angry response (which I will ignore of course) for calling such comments "******" BECAUSE THEY ARE. I watched the whole fight. The punishment Khan was getting in the body was brutal, and Canelo was just slowing him down to prepare for what you mistakenly and ridiculously call a "lucky punch."

You must be a Crawford fan or something, to utter such ridiculous comments, trying to dismiss Canelo. Possibly Crawford actually is a much better boxer than Canelo, but that doesn't mean that any of the ridiculous assessments about Canelo-Khan you just made are true. After the 1st round, Khan was being taken apart slowly, and in fact it took actually too long for him to be knocked out unconscious. It took that long because evidently he takes body shots much better than face shots and Canelo is more of a body puncher than a face puncher.

I am no Canelo fan and like I wrote above, I think Crawford is a better boxer than Canelo, but if I read something totally ridiculous, I feel like I need to set it straight even if the person being corrected for writing utter lies hates me for stating the truth.

[Richard G]

This whole Khan thing is bizarre, he needs to seek medical attention ASAP.

[angkag]

That is utterly ridiculous.

No "schooling" at all (sorry but that's a ****** comment).

No "lucky punch" at all. (A very smart faint blow to the body, to set up a brutal face punch, a Canelo trademark move).

No "winning every round easily" yet another ****** comment. Khan won maybe the 1st round "easily" --flashy face punches, that was it-- but from there on, since the 2nd round, Canelo was flattening Khan with brutal body punches, and actually winning every single round after the 1st, give or take the 2nd maybe. Just the 1st round was won "clearly" by Khan, that's it.

I am ready for an angry response (which I will ignore of course) for calling such comments "******" BECAUSE THEY ARE. I watched the whole fight. The punishment Khan was getting in the body was brutal, and Canelo was just slowing him down to prepare for what you mistakenly and ridiculously call a "lucky punch."

You must be a Crawford fan or something, to utter such ridiculous comments, trying to dismiss Canelo. Possibly Crawford actually is a much better boxer than Canelo, but that doesn't mean that any of the ridiculous assessments about Canelo-Khan you just made are true. After the 1st round, Khan was being taken apart slowly, and in fact it took actually too long for him to be knocked out unconscious. It took that long because evidently he takes body shots much better than face shots and Canelo is more of a body puncher than a face puncher.

I am no Canelo fan and like I wrote above, I think Crawford is a better boxer than Canelo, but if I read something totally ridiculous, I feel like I need to set it straight even if the person being corrected for writing utter lies hates me for stating the truth.

Don't feed the trolls lol ! I think the OP was either trolling or being deliberately sarcastic.

For sure, Khan actually looked pretty good in spots vs Canelo, and while he was up on one card at the end of 5, he was down on the other two, and you could see Canelo setting up that goodnight punch for at least a round or two. I think OP knows all this.

[lion33lit]

Wow! This guy is living in a Stan Lee Marvel alternate universe! Over there Crawford was slowing down.....

[Marvlus Marv]

I've said it a thousand times: the more beatings he takes, the more deluded he gets. It's no joke The boy is a proper clown.

[Marvlus Marv]

That is utterly ridiculous.

No "schooling" at all (sorry but that's a ****** comment).

No "lucky punch" at all. (A very smart faint blow to the body, to set up a brutal face punch, a Canelo trademark move).

No "winning every round easily" yet another ****** comment. Khan won maybe the 1st round "easily" --flashy face punches, that was it-- but from there on, since the 2nd round, Canelo was flattening Khan with brutal body punches, and actually winning every single round after the 1st, give or take the 2nd maybe. Just the 1st round was won "clearly" by Khan, that's it.

I am ready for an angry response (which I will ignore of course) for calling such comments "******" BECAUSE THEY ARE. I watched the whole fight. The punishment Khan was getting in the body was brutal, and Canelo was just slowing him down to prepare for what you mistakenly and ridiculously call a "lucky punch."

You must be a Crawford fan or something, to utter such ridiculous comments, trying to dismiss Canelo. Possibly Crawford actually is a much better boxer than Canelo, but that doesn't mean that any of the ridiculous assessments about Canelo-Khan you just made are true. After the 1st round, Khan was being taken apart slowly, and in fact it took actually too long for him to be knocked out unconscious. It took that long because evidently he takes body shots much better than face shots and Canelo is more of a body puncher than a face puncher.

I am no Canelo fan and like I wrote above, I think Crawford is a better boxer than Canelo, but if I read something totally ridiculous, I feel like I need to set it straight even if the person being corrected for writing utter lies hates me for stating the truth.

Come on, man. He was being sarcastic, I'm sure about that.