Aaaaand this is the problem with these guys NOT fighting one another. It creates a sea of doubt about whether they're really THAT good. And lesser competition will never bring out the best in anyone.
Just Being Honest, Both Crawford and Spence are overrated
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Well you clearly have an agenda for Gervonta.
Plus it seems you would give your right nut for Lopez to beat Loma which both are delusional hence your agenda.
I'm surprise you don't have Lopez at no. 1Comment
-
Bro, that's not an agenda, that's being a fan. An agenda is if I was rooting or rating someone on race, their promoters, or something like that.
I'm not gonna start anything with you because I respect you as a Lomachenko fan. Here I'm basically ranking American fighters. Is that OK? If you disagree with me, I'm cool.Comment
-
Yer that's all good bro..Bro, that's not an agenda, that's being a fan. An agenda is if I was rooting or rating someone on race, their promoters, or something like that.
I'm not gonna start anything with you because I respect you as a Lomachenko fan. Here I'm basically ranking American fighters. Is that OK? If you disagree with me, I'm cool.
We are all her for different opinions if we were all the same it would be boring.
It's just hard for me to think Esp. Of Gervonta as any p4p when he beats up on dudes at 126, plus the ducking of Loma.
Do you still think Lopez would beat Loma after yesterday?Comment
-
Maybe you just read my Lomachenko posts.Yer that's all good bro..
We are all her for different opinions if we were all the same it would be boring.
It's just hard for me to think Esp. Of Gervonta as any p4p when he beats up on dudes at 126, plus the ducking of Loma.
Do you still think Lopez would beat Loma after yesterday?
I've always said on here P4P is the biggest BS ever. It's a person's opinion. I like your opinion better than any journalists, because you are here dealing with it. You are more legit than a website's P4P rankings. I usually discredit if I hear a hardcore even mention P4P. It's fictional.
However, there are best fighters in the world without weight considerations. Lomachenko is one of my top 10. I don't deal in the if stuff, P4P, just who I think the best fighters in the world right now are.
In that post, I was ranking best US boxers.Comment
-
how can you say walters is a a one hit wonder when he went on to destroy darchinyan then donaire? If anything he was an very game for the lomachenko fight but loma is just on a different level.Comment
-
I been saying this for the longest both crawford and spence have not fought any real competition. i wouldn't be surprised if they keep taking the danny garcia route....Comment
-
Isnt it TOO early, S-h-e-l-d-o-n to be ****ing about there records? Try in another 10 years when the results are in.Both are very talented but can we honestly say they are actually "proven"
Best names on Crawford's resume is
1.Khan(past his prime and has been knocked out numerous times)
2. Postol who was nothing special and was beaten by Josh Taylor
3. Indongo who Prograis stopped early than Crawford
4. Benavidez who was basically fighting on one damn leg
Best Names on Spence resume
1. Brook came down from 160 and took a beating from GGG
2. Mikey Garcia a natural 130 pounder who went up to 147 to fight the naturally bigger and stronger fighter. Mikey was a significant underdog.
All in all, Spence does have better names on his resume and I have no doubt that Brook and Mikey would've beat the Khan that Crawford has fought. But my god, if we had prime Floyd, Manny, Oscar, Tito, Vernon, Margarrito, and Mosley in this era, I have no doubt that these two would've been exposed already. Crawford gets hit too much and has yet to fight an A-level fighter. Spence is talented but he also has asterisk on his resume. right now, I do not know who comes out on top in this 147. Hopefully, if Thurman gets back to his old self he can make things interesting, but right now, the welterweight division is clearly the most overrated division in boxing.
KIDS.............Comment
Comment