Should it be illegal to have "options" on a fighter?
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
The question you asked didn't make any sense. The promoter of the tennis tournament is using their leverage to force the players to play who the tournament says if they want to be allowed to compete in the tournament. It's not Federer having control over the other players, it's the tennis promoter. No different than boxing.Comment
-
The question you asked didn't make any sense. The promoter of the tennis tournament is using their leverage to force the players to play who the tournament says if they want to be allowed to compete in the tournament. It's not Federer having control over the other players, it's the tennis promoter. No different than boxing.
Do the tennis authorities make special deals for some players that gives them advantages?
Do they act on the behalf of some players?Comment
-
Yes. Every sport bends rules to benefit the stars and to encourage the creation of stars. Some sports do a better job than others of maintaining the illusion and protecting consumer confidence. Boxing has always been organized poorly and therefore has been one of the worst sports at protecting its image and credibility.Comment
-
Yes. Every sport bends rules to benefit the stars and to encourage the creation of stars. Some sports do a better job than others of maintaining the illusion and protecting consumer confidence. Boxing has always been organized poorly and therefore has been one of the worst sports at protecting its image and credibility.
Any examples of the Tennis authorities giving advantages to the stars.Comment
-
Comment
-
There you go making things up again. After already trying to switch your premise three times.
No, I am not going to publicly out the rampant corruption in all sports, tennis included. Stick to being a fan. Or not even a fan, stick to being a hater, since for some reason you want to believe boxing is the only corrupt sport.Comment
Comment