LEt's just say that man vs woman was entertained, but at it would e the worst man vs the best woman type of matches and Rod Salka was the chosen one against one of the best woman fighters of all time.
Rod Salka vs Claressa Shields
Collapse
-
-
They are the same listed height--5' 8"--but fight at different weights, Salka is LW normally, 135lbs, whereas Shields competes at MW, or SMW, so 168lbs. Providing they fight at the same weight, I'd go with Salka, simply because of the much, much stiffer competition that he has faced to get to where he is. And I think that holds true, no matter what catchweight is imposed. If they fight at their normal fighting weights, then I'm not so sure - I think then the extra 30lbs might make the difference for ShieldsComment
-
Rod Salka, easily. There's a reason these ******** keep dominating women's competition whenever they enterComment
-
Rod salka. Thing is even someone like rod salka is a very talented boxer. I call fighters bums on here but the reality is people like salka are in the top few percent of boxers in all the world. Hed be far too good for shields.Comment
-
Man, now that I think about a bit more, even with a big weight difference, Salka would kick her assComment
-
Comment
-
Comment