Tyson vs. Douglas II

[Violent Demise]

Nah, even a skillfully prime Tyson may have lost against that version of Douglass. I do know for sure that he would never get ko'd if he was truly focused.

Douglas didn't really beat Tyson. Tyson's personal and out of ring troubles are what beat him. Douglas was just the one who was there to take advantage of it.

[BKM-]

well
that your opinion.........and i respect it.....

but i find it hard to imagine douglas in the same class as mike....

infact i find it impossible..........prime and focused tyson every time..........

He's not in the same class as a prime Tyson. He just had a perfect style to beat Mike. He had reach, he doubled up on the jab confusing Mike, he would give him a lot of trouble because he made it hard for him to start a rythym.

I guess i would give it to Mike most of the time, but like i said, its hard to tell.

[Verstyle]

He's not in the same class as a prime Tyson. He just had a perfect style to beat Mike. He had reach, he doubled up on the jab confusing Mike, he would give him a lot of trouble because he made it hard for him to start a rythym.

I guess i would give it to Mike most of the time, but like i said, its hard to tell.

i know im not reading u giving douglas a **** load of credit.*exiting in discrace*

[micky_knox]

He's not in the same class as a prime Tyson. He just had a perfect style to beat Mike. He had reach, he doubled up on the jab confusing Mike, he would give him a lot of trouble because he made it hard for him to start a rythym.

I guess i would give it to Mike most of the time, but like i said, its hard to tell.

trust me..............if tyson had actully took the fight seriously we wouldnt even be talking about douglas........

i dont want to disrespect buster at all.........but he caught mike at the perfect time.....fair play to bust.......but the real mike would have beat every time........

[BKM-]

i know im not reading u giving douglas a **** load of credit.*exiting in discrace*

I've been a Tyson fan for a longer while than some of these guys(No dissrespect), so i know what im talking about without being biased. Yeah Douglass was a disgrace, does that mean he would lose?

[Verstyle]

I've been a Tyson fan for a longer while than some of these guys(No dissrespect), so i know what im talking about without being biased. Yeah Douglass was a disgrace, does that mean he would lose?

no disrespect towards me cause u werent talkin about me. obviously i know alot about tyson if i've been to catskills gym and try to imitate his fighting style. it takes hours of studying to do so

[micky_knox]

I've been a Tyson fan for a longer while than some of these guys(No dissrespect), so i know what im talking about without being biased. Yeah Douglass was a disgrace, does that mean he would lose?

why was he a disgrace? i missed somthing........


ive been a tyson fan since i was a kid.........he introduced ne to the sport.....

i remember waiting up to watch his fights at 4am then going to school...lol

[Mike Tyson77]

Also, if you noticed, Tyson didnt throw any combos at douglas. Not 1. A motivated Tyson takes care of Douglas in 1-2 rounds every time.

[BKM-]

no disrespect towards me cause u werent talkin about me. obviously i know alot about tyson if i've been to catskills gym and try to imitate his fighting style. it takes hours of studying to do so

Yeah i know. I used to be like some of these people(No one from this board), just turning a Tysonfan and thinking he was always unbeatable and ****. Im past that already.

[micky_knox]

Yeah i know. I used to be like some of these people(No one from this board), just turning a Tysonfan and thinking he was always unbeatable and ****. Im past that already.

nobody is unbeatable.......

but to suggest that douglas is better than tyson is a bit silly to say the least.......

and to the other poster........no mike didnt throw any combos........
thats why he gor beat up.......