Comments Thread For: Hearn: Luis Ortiz Was The First Name Anthony Joshua Gave Me

[SchoolTheseCats]

The standard is a fucking rematch clause minimum. Nothing wrong with that.

This multi fight talk is just rumours from you. Nobody knows what the situation is or even whether Ortiz would have a problem with a 3 fight deal.

You are literally making up a roadblock to attack Hearn for something he hasn't even done.

Grow up.

It’s not talk Hearn said whoever they offer fight to will get same deal miller had, dazn had a two fight deal with miller even if he lost to show his next fights it’s in the article

[Straightener]

The Ortiz myth will be in flames after Joshua beats the life out of him

I’m in

[Motorcity Cobra]

If you think Hearn won't deviate from the standard then why are you talking about "multi-fight deals" as if that was some dirty trick only Eddie pulled and a valid reason for Ortiz to turn down a shot at AJ??

You're pathetic, getting excuses in before you even know if they will be needed.

Who was the last voluntary non Champion AJ has fought that wasnt tied to Hearn? (Hell, Eddie even got options on the champion Parker)

I'll wait.....

[EnglishOxide]

Who was the last voluntary non Champion AJ has fought that wasnt tied to Hearn? (Hell, Eddie even got options on the champion Parker)

I'll wait.....

Wtf are you actually talking about?

Tell me who Eddie Hearn FORCED on to a multi fight contract to secure the AJ fight.

[Motorcity Cobra]

Wtf are you actually talking about?

Tell me who Eddie Hearn FORCED on to a multi fight contract to secure the AJ fight.

He can't force anybody to do anything. He can present them with an offer and they can accept or refuse.

Who was the last voluntary non Champion AJ has fought that wasnt tied to Hearn? (Hell, Eddie even got options on the champion Parker)

I'll wait.....

[EnglishOxide]

It’s not talk Hearn said whoever they offer fight to will get same deal miller had, dazn had a two fight deal with miller even if he lost to show his next fights it’s in the article

And if the fighter doesn't want that in the contract in the event of a loss im sure it will be removed. Miller probably ****in negotiated it.

It sounds like insurance for the fighter to me. What's the problem?

[Motorcity Cobra]

For the Hearn fanboys this is not a diss against Hearn. It is standard for promoters to get options on the fighter when it's a voluntary. It's common sense & business sense. For Champion vs Champion a immediate rematch clause is standard.

The only place you can go & fight a champion without options for your next fight is at PBC. Hell, Wilder didn't even have an immediate rematch clause with Fury even though he was a voluntary defense

[EnglishOxide]

He can't force anybody to do anything. He can present them with an offer and they can accept or refuse.

Who was the last voluntary non Champion AJ has fought that wasnt tied to Hearn? (Hell, Eddie even got options on the champion Parker)

I'll wait.....

Who the **** cares? Why don't you tell me, seeing as this means so much to you?

I don't recall Parker's last fight being on a Matchroom show.

I don't recall Takam complaining about getting work on Matchroom shows.

I don't recall Whyte complaining about working with Matchroom.

So what are you being a little bitch about exactly?

How many voluntarys has AJ even fought anyway? They've ALL been mandatories IIRC.

[Straightener]

Ortiz is so highly rated ( at least in this forum) that even the biggest Joshua hater can say good fight

But knowing the divs on this site they will flip flop opinion and spin this s**t

[SchoolTheseCats]

And if the fighter doesn't want that in the contract in the event of a loss im sure it will be removed. Miller probably ****in negotiated it.

It sounds like insurance for the fighter to me. What's the problem?

No problem as long as dazn/Hearn doesn’t have a problem with that part of contract being removed just keep standard rematch clause champion always gets in place