Why they have Crawford P4P?

[Joe Beamish]

I just dont get it. I mean f#ck the eye test. Resume speaks for themselves. I am no fan of Canelo, but how is he not considered
P4P #1 right now? Wether you had him losing the GGG fight or not he has 2 wins over him and he has the best resume beside Pacquiao.


Crawford is for sure top 5 but why is he #1?

I think he's generally ranked #2 after Loma.

So you're all stirred up because most people rank Crawford a whole two or three spots ahead of where you do in a beauty contest?

[boxinggod101]

I think he's generally ranked #2 after Loma.

So you're all stirred up because most people rank Crawford a whole two or three spots ahead of where you do in a beauty contest?

You were trying to be funny or something? Stirred up? Crawford is a very good fighter but his resume is pretty weak to be named #1 P4P. It is a forum where we post our thoughts and we discuss it.

If you dont agree you give your opinion than we can discuss. Your childish answers prove that you a bit slow and a bit too emotional.

[boxinggod101]

It's called boxing skills. Canelo has some, Crawford is a wizard, not the Floyd level. I can't see anyone who would beat Bud, maybe Spence last year, but that window is closed now.

He has great skills. But for me, to be P4P no.1 you need the skills AND the resume. Like it was said before we dont have a clear P4P guy right now. When Floyd was there it was obvious who was number 1. When Floyd retired and Manny was going up in division it was clear who was. When Roy Jones was destroying everybody, it was clear. Now the no.1 spot is pretty much to grab. I just think there is some fighters who got great skills and better resume than Crawford and they should take the spot but hey, to each our own.