That's your problem. You don't understand what P4P rankings are. They aren't based on resume alone. That's why a lot of people entirely disregard them. They can't be qualified. Much of it is eye test.
I rate Canelo higher P4P than Crawford base on resume and eye test. Eye test alone isnt enough to be considered the best P4P fighter in the world. You cant have a weak resume and be the no.1 fighter... no way.
I rate Canelo higher P4P than Crawford base on resume and eye test. Eye test alone isnt enough to be considered the best P4P fighter in the world. You cant have a weak resume and be the no.1 fighter... no way.
Well, most boxing fans and media professionals disagree with your opinion then. That's ok though.
I have both GGG and Canelo higher than Crawford on my list but don't argue with those who have Crawford number 1. I thought GGG beat Canelo twice in close great fights. Where in the hell do you get the wrong idea that Canelo has two wins over GGG???? The first Canelo-GGG fight was officially a DRAW not a Canelo win. Get your facts right.
My mistake. Thats still a better win than anything Crawford has done.
Well, most boxing fans and media professionals disagree with your opinion then. That's ok though.
Its all good thats why I opened that thread. I dont agree that a fighter with a resume like Crawford has can be no.1 P4P. Like someone said right now there is no clear no.1 like we had when Floyd was there or when Manny was dominating. Its pretty hard to have a clear no.1 .
Its all good thats why I opened that thread. I dont agree that a fighter with a resume like Crawford has can be no.1 P4P. Like someone said right now there is no clear no.1 like we had when Floyd was there or when Manny was dominating. Its pretty hard to have a clear no.1 .
I agree with that. I have Loma edging it but I don't have any compelling argument for anyone being a clear #1. I guess that's good for boxing though, if there's enough great fighters that no one can say one guy is head and shoulders above the rest.
Every publication has Lomachenko #1. RING, TBRB, BWAA, ESPN, Boxing News. The only place I can find with Crawford #1 is Boxing Scene, but that list is just one man's opinion. crold1, when are you moving Lomachenko to #1 on your list?
When I see something that makes me think he's not the best active fighter in boxing. Could be tomorrow. Planning to update the list either way after this fight. Been a few months.
I just dont get it. I mean f#ck the eye test. Resume speaks for themselves. I am no fan of Canelo, but how is he not considered
P4P #1 right now? Wether you had him losing the GGG fight or not he has 2 wins over him and he has the best resume beside Pacquiao.
Crawford is for sure top 5 but why is he #1?
It's called boxing skills. Canelo has some, Crawford is a wizard, not the Floyd level. I can't see anyone who would beat Bud, maybe Spence last year, but that window is closed now.
When I see something that makes me think he's not the best active fighter in boxing. Could be tomorrow. Planning to update the list either way after this fight. Been a few months.
Exactly. Innovation is important. I like your answer.
Crawford is my number 1 best fighter in the world, too, not P4P. I don't deal in fantasies. I have Usyk 2, Canelo at 3, Spence 4.
Tweet
Comment