Comments Thread For: Canelo Will 'Gladly' Fight Golovkin Again If GGG Has A Belt

[whoseyourdaddy]

Nah I made a new account in Feb you fuc.king dunce. But again brilliant logic from Gazor.

Razor seriously though, you're (not your, it's you're you literal fuc.king ****** lol) literally the biggest ****** on this whole site. You post small responses and even in those you can't spell and can't form a coherent sentence half the time lol.

All of you Canelo groupies and GGG haters are just tribal borderline ******s and I don't give a sh.it about y'alls opinion on anything. Y'all are just a bunch of borderline IQ tards who repeat what each other says and then when you hear it repeated you think you guys are on to something lol.

Just because 100 ******s get together and all start saying the same thing does not mean you guys are getting it right. It just means you guys are doing the equivalent of playing in the Special Olympics and that anyone with a working brain would see your posts and pat your ******ed ass on the head and move on.

But keep being you, you literal 80 IQ Borderline ******!

And get out of my post mentions you fu.cking fa.ggot. I don't wanna have to find you and sl.ap your ******ed ass through the computer screen.

You illiterate dumb F*** and you're accusing everybody of illiteracy? you DUMB FUÇK!

[KO MX]

LoL, this is exactly what I'm talking about! This is why there's no point debating boxing with you when it comes to Triple g!
You give Triple g credit for destroying an inactive, smaller, coming off a loss Vanes and a smaller, moving up two weight divisions Brook but when Canelo destroyed Josesito Lopez well he was too small,...
How the fucc does that work???

He doesn't give credit to Canelo for beating Chavez Jr who was actually way way bigger than Canelo, but Rubio is a good win for Golovkin just because he smashed him, yeah the same Rubio who lost to Chavez Jr a wide decision and then he uses a triangle theory with Ishida "who went 12 rds with Pirog and Williams" so, we add Paul Williams and Pirog to Lil g's resume?

[KO MX]

37 pages... lol holy ****.

Really impressive, just the same guy with 7-8 posts by page

[Boxing_1013]

LoL, this is exactly what I'm talking about! This is why there's no point debating boxing with you when it comes to Triple g!
You give Triple g credit for destroying an inactive, smaller, coming off a loss Vanes and a smaller, moving up two weight divisions Brook but when Canelo destroyed Josesito Lopez well he was too small,...
How the fucc does that work???

I give him credit for doing what he was supposed to in the Khan fight.

For me predominantly because Lopez started at 135 and never fought at JMW other than that Canelo fight. And Lopez performed similarly against Maidana and Berto at lower weights getting KOd.

I think Canelo is just naturally a lot bigger than Lopez and I don't think GGG is much naturally bigger than Brook or Vanes, imo. Those 3 guys, and Canelo, are all roughly the same size. If GGG had a KO win over Pacquiao at 160 I would say it was a sh.it win. I don't think Canelo's win over Lopez is a sh.it win but imo it was a little easier size wise than the Brook or Vanes fights.

I agree that those 3 are similar type fights though. If you want to list that as a good win that's fine. I just know that if GGG fought Lopez at 155 and did that to him I would think it was a big guy KOing a little guy.

[Boxing_1013]

He doesn't give credit to Canelo for beating Chavez Jr who was actually way way bigger than Canelo, but Rubio is a good win for Golovkin just because he smashed him, yeah the same Rubio who lost to Chavez Jr a wide decision and then he uses a triangle theory with Ishida "who went 12 rds with Pirog and Williams" so, we add Paul Williams and Pirog to Lil g's resume?

Every decision JCC got I view with skepticism. And if Canelo KOd him I would say it was a good win. If GGG went 10 rounds with Rubio I wouldn't say it was a good win.

My point with Ishida is that he obviously wasn't a bum. Or not enough of a bum to get KOd by Williams or Pirog who everyone rates highly. But GGG did it to him in 3 rounds. That is impressive.

[Boxing_1013]

You illiterate dumb F*** and you're accusing everybody of illiteracy? you DUMB FUÇK!

Are you trying to say I misspelled something? Or do you not know what 'literal' means lol. I love when you dumb.ass clowns try and act smart lol. It's always fun.

[Boxing_1013]

whoseyourdaddy[/B];19649458]You illiterate dumb F*** and you're accusing everybody of illiteracy? you DUMB FUÇK!

Dude your name is literally the wrong use of the word Whose/who's by the way.

How can you honestly try and get on anyone about spelling/English/intelligence when in your very own username you display your ******ity and illiteracy lol?

[Boxing_1013]

Seriously? go look it up in YouTube GGG and Abel saying they don't care if Canelo loses to Jacobs, they still rather fight Canelo over anybody else. GGG whole career is defined around what Canelo does or stop doing. triple VaGGGina is obsessed with the GGGinger he has a man's crush on him.

Man I hope English is your second language because it is fu.cking embarrassing reading your attempts at trying to throw a sentence together man. Read a fuc.king book or something.

[BigStomps]

I give him credit for doing what he was supposed to in the Khan fight.

For me predominantly because Lopez started at 135 and never fought at JMW other than that Canelo fight. And Lopez performed similarly against Maidana and Berto at lower weights getting KOd.

I think Canelo is just naturally a lot bigger than Lopez and I don't think GGG is much naturally bigger than Brook or Vanes, imo. Those 3 guys, and Canelo, are all roughly the same size. If GGG had a KO win over Pacquiao at 160 I would say it was a sh.it win. I don't think Canelo's win over Lopez is a sh.it win but imo it was a little easier size wise than the Brook or Vanes fights.

I agree that those 3 are similar type fights though. If you want to list that as a good win that's fine. I just know that if GGG fought Lopez at 155 and did that to him I would think it was a big guy KOing a little guy.

Not at all! Canelo beating Lopez and Khan proved nothing! The same way Triple g beating Vanes and Brook proved nothing! They were all smaller guys either coming off losses, inactivity, or moving up two weight divisions regardless of how they look in size...
But I keep it real! I'm not gonna pretend that Canelo beating Lopez and Khan are two of his best wins the way you pretend that Triple g beating Vanes and Brook are great wins for him. Their not!

[BigStomps]

He doesn't give credit to Canelo for beating Chavez Jr who was actually way way bigger than Canelo, but Rubio is a good win for Golovkin just because he smashed him, yeah the same Rubio who lost to Chavez Jr a wide decision and then he uses a triangle theory with Ishida "who went 12 rds with Pirog and Williams" so, we add Paul Williams and Pirog to Lil g's resume?

That's how these triple g fans are.....
They pick and choose who to give credit for accomplishing the same thing's pretty much..
But you make excellent points! They discredit Canelo's win over Chavez but give Triple g credit for beating Rubio... A fighter Chavez destroyed,...
You just can't make this shet up! 😄