Tweet
60/40 is fair. People can say they robbed Fury and they are basically correct, but I don't see that have any real influence on whether Wilder vs Joshua is interesting or not. Even if Fury was given the decision, he was still knocked out cold and survived by a fraction of a second. The ref did an AMAZING job, but that's not always the case and we've all seen fights get waved off immediately after knockdowns like that.
So at the end of the day, to me Wilder's stock is exactly how it was prior to the Fury fight. He's technically terrible, won't win any decisions but will absolutely knock you out cold at any moment. Fury also could've thrown more punches, he also didn't do that much when you really analyze it...more than Wilder but still not very much.
I want to see all of these guys fight each other multiple times and I think 60/40 is fair for any combination of them in favor of whoever has more relevant belts. I do agree that the WBC is the most coveted and perhaps worth 2 of Joshua's belts in my mind.
So at the end of the day, to me Wilder's stock is exactly how it was prior to the Fury fight. He's technically terrible, won't win any decisions but will absolutely knock you out cold at any moment. Fury also could've thrown more punches, he also didn't do that much when you really analyze it...more than Wilder but still not very much.
I want to see all of these guys fight each other multiple times and I think 60/40 is fair for any combination of them in favor of whoever has more relevant belts. I do agree that the WBC is the most coveted and perhaps worth 2 of Joshua's belts in my mind.
Comment