Does Wilder deserve 50/50?

**RoyJonesJrp4pno1** · 03-29-2019, 01:03 PM

Obviously not.

**KTFOKING** · 03-29-2019, 01:05 PM

No he does not, but there is a chance he ends up getting just that. His team is obviously banking on that. But to answer the question, no, no he does not deserve 50/50. 60/40 Joshua is fair and 58/42 or 57/43 would be damn good for Wilder.

**Robbie Barrett** · 03-29-2019, 01:07 PM

Wilder doesn't even deserve 40%. If they didn't rob Fury he wouldn't be in this position. He shouldn't have that belt, he's a paper champ.

**DuckAdonis** · 03-29-2019, 01:10 PM

Not even close. There is a reason why he isn't fighting Breazeale on ppv

**lfc19titles** · 03-29-2019, 01:10 PM

Absolutely not

Wilders highest pay day 7m

Joshua’s 30m

Wilder is being paid 4m
For his next fight by his masters

Joshua getting 25m in the USA and probably 5-7m from the uk easy

Wilder is a coward who needs to be stripped

**NEETzsche** · 03-29-2019, 01:11 PM

No, but I'd like to see Joshua say **** it and give him it anyway. His finances are already secure, he should focus on his legacy now

**Holler** · 03-29-2019, 01:12 PM

Based on what each man brings to the table 40% is an overpayment, Joshua brings three times the belts, he's the bigger draw, brings global recognition, has a better resume, is a better ambassador for the sport and although younger and less experienced has consistently challenged himself and rapidly raised the level of his opposition in half the number of fights. At least it gets the fight made though.

50% however would be bad for boxing, because other fighters would look at the years of padding on Wilder's resume and think that was the path to follow to riches. The split should reflect the level of risk taken in each fighters career and on that criteria Wilder doesn't deserve anything like 50.

**Throwingbombs** · 03-29-2019, 01:13 PM

Of course he ****ing doesn't on any level.

**Boxing Goat** · 03-29-2019, 01:17 PM

Not yet. If he beats Fury first then yes

Does Wilder deserve 50/50?