Comments Thread For: Dillian Whyte Formally Contests WBC Ruling on Wilder-Breazeale
Collapse
-
I honestly can't figure out if you're joking or not.
Hearn's positioning two fighters to fight Wilder. But you're right that they can't both fight him at the same time. Well done.
AJ would fight Wilder for Undisputed.
If that doesn't happen then Whyte might be a mandatory.
Maybe Whyte would like to be the mandatory for a future AJ fight. Or whoever might hold the title.
Whyte and Joshua are two different boxers!Comment
-
If AJ loses to miller there will be immediate rematch. So I dont see how you can plan that many fights ahead or guarantee anything to Wilder. or offer him an $100m AJ contract.Comment
-
Lets see if Eddie sends Wilder an offer to fight Whyte, before he send through an offer to fight AJ. That will be absolute and certain proof that they dont want the AJ/wilder fight to happen anytime soon.I honestly can't figure out if you're joking or not.
Hearn's positioning two fighters to fight Wilder. But you're right that they can't both fight him at the same time. Well done.
AJ would fight Wilder for Undisputed.
If that doesn't happen then Whyte might be a mandatory.
Maybe Whyte would like to be the mandatory for a future AJ fight. Or whoever might hold the title.
Whyte and Joshua are two different boxers!Comment
-
No it won't. He could absolutely send two offers, though if I was Whyte I'd see it as a conflict of interests.
As things stand, if both fighters asked for an offer to be made he could make two offers. Whyte and Joshua aren't in cahoots on this.Comment
-
Lol, Great to see your already making excuses for Eddie.
We want to see Eddies real fighter VS Wilder, not the ******ed looking, chubby one, who cant box.Comment
-
What excuse?
We all want to see AJ v Wilder.
That doesn't mean that every other heavyweight is irrelevant though.
Fighters will still fight for rankings, mandatory status, profile. Just because you only care about two fighters doesn't mean the rest of us don't.Comment
Comment