Pay Per Month ≠≠≠ Pay Per VIEW
Collapse
-
-
You seem like a smart person, we’re both on the same page.
Surely we’d agree that Jacobs vs Canelo is a marquee fight as was Garcia vs Spence. In order to have watched Garcia vs Spence you would have paid its price for that night.
So for $20 more, don’t you think many Canelo or M. Garcia fans are going to pay that “PPV” fight while getting a Years worth? At the very least 1 month of fights for $20?
It’s only great news for boxing fans, nothing negative about it at all. Do keep in mind there are forces in industry at the moment that are paying channels to say that DAZN isn’t worth while disclosing points as to why DAZN is a great platform for various financial reasons.Comment
-
No one is stressing over DAZN besides you. Get over it! You haven’t even been here that long and have already turned into the most annoying poster here. Get a lifeComment
-
Stressing? More like rejoicing!
For one month any time you want, for $19.99, get some great month of boxing.
Or if you want to save big, $99.99 for a full year.
Aside from all that, PPV is old, it’s all about Pay Per Month whenever you want or Pay Per Year!Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
This is a whole other debate. I'm merely saying we are paying to watch boxing in numerous formats beyond the standard PPV everyone talks about. How much you get for your money is more of an individual thing I'd argue & depends on your likes & dislikes.You seem like a smart person, we’re both on the same page.
Surely we’d agree that Jacobs vs Canelo is a marquee fight as was Garcia vs Spence. In order to have watched Garcia vs Spence you would have paid its price for that night.
So for $20 more, don’t you think many Canelo or M. Garcia fans are going to pay that “PPV” fight while getting a Years worth? At the very least 1 month of fights for $20?
But obviously paying $20 to watch Canelo vs Jacobs for casuals or $100 for a years worth of cards for hardcores is of better value then paying more or getting less for Spence vs Garcia.
For sure there are platform fanboys these days like maybe never before, but that bs is coming & going all ways so its not like DAZN is the only "victim".It’s only great news for boxing fans, nothing negative about it at all. Do keep in mind there are forces in industry at the moment that are paying channels to say that DAZN isn’t worth while disclosing points as to why DAZN is a great platform for various financial reasons.
And yea it is a great time for boxing fans in many ways. Then again its the same ole sh^t in other ways cuz platform wars are nothing new & promoters always fail to work together as much as fans would like to see.
I still say for quality DAZN is in 3rd place right now to PBC & ESPN which is the #1 thing I care about. I do feel like DAZN with maybe the 3 biggest names in game at the present moment on their roster (Canelo, Joshua & GGG), they could change my opinion on that real quick & the upcoming schedule is promising.
Thus far DAZN still gots to prove they can become what I think they could become while keeping the price reasonable when they start acquiring more mainstream sports in the future iwhich is my biggest concern for boxing on DAZN.Comment
-
Well, the people complaining about Frankie's threads, I agree with you.
It's his choice, however, to post whatever he wants, as long as he doesn't break the rules. There's something you can do yourselves: Don't open his threads or put him on ignore. Very simple.
I'm cool with Frankie and could care less about promoters and networks.Comment
Comment