Wilder v AJ 50-50 split.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DaNeutral.
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Aug 2018
    • 10087
    • 1,665
    • 342
    • 144,794

    #1

    Wilder v AJ 50-50 split.

    Ive said AJ is the A side over Wilder because he literally is in every possible way. But Wilder refuses to fight, his managers tell him he should refuse to fight unless he gets 50-50.

    Well Wilder is fighting Breazeale next. Joshua has fought Breazeale. Maybe Wilder should have this fight on PPV and show Joshua that he can do similar PPV sales, sell a similar amount of ticket and make the same amount of money from their fight as Joshua did.

    If he does that then what excuse has Joshua got? Would make 50-50 only fair. Joshua has all the belts, Joshua doing PPV by their million, Joshua selling up to 10x as many tickets as Wilder, Joshua seems to be just on another level to Wilder all round but Wilder still demands 50-50.

    Even when the money offered to Wilder by DAZN is just incredible money they needed to know what Joshua was making. So just match Joshua v Breazeale with Wilder v Breazeale and Joshua, Hearn, Skipper, none of them wont have an argument about a 50-50 split.
  • Thuglife Nelo
    Banned
    • Dec 2018
    • 26836
    • 1,299
    • 1,822
    • 654,176

    #2
    Why didn’t Hearn send Wilder and Finkel a contract for Whyte + Joshua? This is what Wilder asked for in 2017.

    7 million for Wilder in the UK was too much to ask for? I thought Wembley arena would easily compensate for that or Matchroom’s general budget...

    Why wasn’t Hearn confident to want Wilder’s WBC as they were for Martin?

    Even if Wilder KO’d Whyte in the UK, we’d still get Wilder vs AJ per Deontay’s request. Since then it’s just been continued side vs side splits.

    Comment

    • DaNeutral.
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Aug 2018
      • 10087
      • 1,665
      • 342
      • 144,794

      #3
      Originally posted by Frankie2Jabs
      Why didn’t Hearn send Wilder and Finkel a contract for Whyte + Joshua? This is what Wilder asked for in 2017.

      7 million for Wilder in the UK was too much to ask for? I thought Wembley arena would easily compensate for that or Matchroom’s general budget...

      Why wasn’t Hearn confident to want Wilder’s WBC as they were for Martin?

      Even if Wilder KO’d Whyte in the UK, we’d still get Wilder vs AJ per Deontay’s request. Since then it’s just been continued side vs side splits.

      Lovely story from 2 years ago. Has nothing to do with the anything in 2019.

      But to answer your question Hearn fancied Whyte to beat Wilder and then why would they want Joshua v Wilder when Joshua was looking for the belt and Wilder would no longer have it. If Whyte beat Wilder Joshua would want to fight Whyte. But in the end i remember that offer being made. They bent to Wilders demand. Still no fight.
      Last edited by DaNeutral.; 03-24-2019, 04:39 AM.

      Comment

      • LacedUp
        Still Smokin'
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Oct 2009
        • 29171
        • 781
        • 381
        • 132,163

        #4
        Originally posted by Frankie2Jabs
        Why didn’t Hearn send Wilder and Finkel a contract for Whyte + Joshua? This is what Wilder asked for in 2017.

        7 million for Wilder in the UK was too much to ask for? I thought Wembley arena would easily compensate for that or Matchroom’s general budget...

        Why wasn’t Hearn confident to want Wilder’s WBC as they were for Martin?

        Even if Wilder KO’d Whyte in the UK, we’d still get Wilder vs AJ per Deontay’s request. Since then it’s just been continued side vs side splits.
        They made that offer. Everyone knows that.

        Comment

        • Thuglife Nelo
          Banned
          • Dec 2018
          • 26836
          • 1,299
          • 1,822
          • 654,176

          #5
          Originally posted by DaNeutral.
          Lovely story from 2 years ago. Has nothing to do with the anything in 2019.

          But to answer your question Hearn fancied Whyte to beat Wilder and then why would they want Joshua v Wilder when Joshua was looking for the belt and Wilder would no longer have it. If Whyte beat Wilder Joshua would want to fight Whyte.
          You should be more honest...

          “7 million is too much for Wilder...”. -Hearn

          Do you honesty think the Hearn family wouldn’t gamble an extra 2 million for Wilder if they were so confident that Whyte would beat Wilder?

          You should know the essence of ******** to win MORE. How much would Whyte vs Joshua unification make at Wembley? You think the Hearn family would be ****** enough to not gamble an extra 2 million for all the 9 figure net glory for Whyte vs Joshu Undisputed?

          No, of course not, cause Hearn said 7 million was too much yet they paid Martin 5 million.

          The answer to the riddle is that they knew Whye’s chances were slim to no chance of Whyte beating Wilder.

          That’s obvious.

          Comment

          • Thuglife Nelo
            Banned
            • Dec 2018
            • 26836
            • 1,299
            • 1,822
            • 654,176

            #6
            Originally posted by LacedUp
            They made that offer. Everyone knows that.
            Hearn sent Wilder and Finkel a contract for Whyte and Joshua? What do you mean “offer?” Like a social media offer?

            Again, Hearn said Wilder was asking for too much...

            Comment

            • LacedUp
              Still Smokin'
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Oct 2009
              • 29171
              • 781
              • 381
              • 132,163

              #7
              Originally posted by Frankie2Jabs
              Hearn sent Wilder and Finkel a contract for Whyte and Joshua? What do you mean “offer?” Like a social media offer?

              Again, Hearn said Wilder was asking for too much...
              They made an offer for it, but Wilder didn't want it.

              To my knowledge the only contract sent, was for the 15 mil that Wilder accepted but never signed.

              Previous to that, a Whyte+AJ deal was on offer.

              Comment

              • Toffee
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Oct 2018
                • 7336
                • 2,541
                • 74
                • 62,824

                #8
                I don't know why this is still a topic.

                We know what it takes to make the fight.

                It's nothing to do with whether it's a good offer or not. The fight will just always be worth more in a year's time.

                We just wait to see if Team Wilder ever think it's the right time.

                Comment

                • DaNeutral.
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Aug 2018
                  • 10087
                  • 1,665
                  • 342
                  • 144,794

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Frankie2Jabs
                  You should be more honest...

                  “7 million is too much for Wilder...”. -Hearn

                  Do you honesty think the Hearn family wouldn’t gamble an extra 2 million for Wilder if they were so confident that Whyte would beat Wilder?

                  You should know the essence of ******** to win MORE. How much would Whyte vs Joshua unification make at Wembley? You think the Hearn family would be ****** enough to not gamble an extra 2 million for all the 9 figure net glory for Whyte vs Joshu Undisputed?

                  No, of course not, cause Hearn said 7 million was too much yet they paid Martin 5 million.

                  The answer to the riddle is that they knew Whye’s chances were slim to no chance of Whyte beating Wilder.

                  That’s obvious.
                  The offer was made. But that was 2 years ago. Wilder has just been offered 80 million to face Joshua and HES TURNED THAT DOWN TOO. 2 years later and nothing has changed.

                  But my point is why dont Wilder just do Breazeale on PPV and prove to Hearn and Joshua that Wilder is the same as Joshua and THEN demand 50-50. Its a much better look than doing nothing near Joshua and demanding 50-50, its also a much better look than Wilder turning down the DAZN offer cuz near enough everybody is looking at Wilder as a ducker right now.

                  Comment

                  • Ray*
                    Be safe!!!
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jul 2005
                    • 44867
                    • 1,654
                    • 1,608
                    • 558,890

                    #10
                    I don’t think it was ever about 50-50, I didn’t think anyone was scared etc I always knew it was about money for BOTH sides. The only issue was Wilder fooled a lot of these dumb posters on here with the “Don’t hide around managers/promoters/financial” etc

                    Both sides would happily let this fight marinate as long as neither loses their belts, in secret they both want each other to win. Like Haymon deputy said “The fight would happen when we are ready for it”

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP