Wilder was fighting Breazeale next any way, so why the rush to sign?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • KTFOKING
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jun 2018
    • 14399
    • 1,266
    • 284
    • 344,781

    #11
    Originally posted by REDEEMER
    The rush to sign would be to get him on Dazn platform should he lose to Breazeale it still keeps the Joshua fight alive and he makes more then 500,000 K after that a fight on the Dazn platform . I really don't think he gets by Breazeale so all this is going to backfire anyway , don't tell me it can't happen , I'm a boxing expert and Wilders taking an L in May .
    Bold prediction but I like it! In that case yes, would be a HUGE failure on the part of Wilder and his team and he would lose out on a 40M pay day. Supposedly, Wilder was guaranteed the Joshua showdown even if he lost to Breazeale.

    Comment

    • El Gitano
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jul 2014
      • 2400
      • 178
      • 73
      • 32,535

      #12
      He was fighting him anyway but not for $20 million

      Comment

      • REDEEMER
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Oct 2018
        • 11820
        • 1,336
        • 1,008
        • 153,574

        #13
        Originally posted by KTFOKING
        Bold prediction but I like it! In that case yes, would be a HUGE failure on the part of Wilder and his team and he would lose out on a 40M pay day. Supposedly, Wilder was guaranteed the Joshua showdown even if he lost to Breazeale.
        Wilder signing with Dazn ensured the fight , it's why when threads like this are made , do people really want to see this fight ? It's like they make excuses non stop. I think Breazeale is all wrong for Wilder , it's a fight Breazeales more then capable of Winning at least in a first meeting.

        Comment

        • rudy
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Sep 2003
          • 6003
          • 682
          • 1,232
          • 52,192

          #14
          [QUOTE=Lopez_Boxing;19601872]But wouldn't wilder had been guaranteed this is boxing

          Comment

          • Lopez_Boxing
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jan 2017
            • 4655
            • 245
            • 81
            • 97,428

            #15
            Originally posted by El Gitano
            He was fighting him anyway but not for $20 million
            Pssh that would be dumb. You have to pay more taxes on 20 million then you do on 5, duh

            Comment

            • SweetPbfAli
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Aug 2006
              • 3291
              • 794
              • 798
              • 28,865

              #16
              To me, it sounds like Wilder didn't want to be restricted to a single platform and he enjoys the ability to be a free agent of sorts. Was the DAZN deal strictly for their platform only?

              Comment

              • kiaba360
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Nov 2010
                • 19200
                • 2,338
                • 3,508
                • 45,265

                #17
                Originally posted by SweetPbfAli
                To me, it sounds like Wilder didn't want to be restricted to a single platform and he enjoys the ability to be a free agent of sorts. Was the DAZN deal strictly for their platform only?
                Seems like the 3 fights would've been exclusively on their platform. Regardless, all this talk about the value in being a free agent means little until he actually fights on a non-PBC network.

                Comment

                • REDEEMER
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Oct 2018
                  • 11820
                  • 1,336
                  • 1,008
                  • 153,574

                  #18
                  Originally posted by SweetPbfAli
                  To me, it sounds like Wilder didn't want to be restricted to a single platform and he enjoys the ability to be a free agent of sorts. Was the DAZN deal strictly for their platform only?
                  He is restricted to Showtime now though . How is this not being restricted ? Ha He was going to be attached to one of the platforms ESPN,DAZN or Showtime. He chose the less paying one with also no Joshua fight.

                  Comment

                  • Stinger1
                    Interim Champion
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Oct 2017
                    • 805
                    • 53
                    • 0
                    • 26,584

                    #19
                    Originally posted by REDEEMER
                    Wilder signing with Dazn ensured the fight , it's why when threads like this are made , do people really want to see this fight ? It's like they make excuses non stop. I think Breazeale is all wrong for Wilder , it's a fight Breazeales more then capable of Winning at least in a first meeting.
                    He only has to win once, there is no rematch clause.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP