Originally posted by Jax teller
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Hearn: Wilder and Fury Don't Want Joshua - Now Fans Know!
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Ake-Dawg View PostSo are you presuming that Wilder was never presented with a contract or contract details or the "how" this whole thing was gonna work? That's might presumptuous.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bronx2245 View PostI'm not missing anything! Fury fought Wilder on SHO, but he didn't have to sign a multi-fight contract! Joshua was on SHO, and he left, without fighting Wilder. However it's all good for Joshua to go to DAZN, and for Fury to go to ESPN, but Wilder is a duck if he wants to stay with the folks who made him? Hearn said it himself, when DAZN made the offer, "this is the only way this fight was EVER going to happen..." So what was all the commotion for last summer? For nothing? And you're cool with that? I'm not! We'll just agree to disagree.
You clearly don’t understand how boxing works
The multi deal fight is with Joshua, he has to face Breazeale as it’s his mando
So it’s mando- joshua and Joshua
You are saying dazn should pay money for wilder to fight on showtime ? You are making zero sense
How else are the two Joshua fights going to be made without it becoming a multi fight on dazn ? This has how boxing works
A network that offers the most money way gets it, in This case it’s dazn
Do you understand that concept ?
If showtime offer the same money then they will agree to the two fights on showtime, so that locks both guys for showtime for two fights but they are free to go after that
But in the above case it’s dazn
Jeez man, wake up
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jax teller View PostYou're presuming that the contract didn't have the terms that relied on joshua signing up as well and ignoring the facts that it wouldn't make sense for DAZN to provide this money without an AJ fight and Wilders team didn't agree because they believe they can get more money later and not the reason you say.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Deus View PostPercentage of what? The fight wouldn't be PPV. All there would be to split is the gate and the UK PPV.
Percentages do not work with the subscription based model because you do not pay to watch 1 single fight, you pay to watch every fight.
Equally you can't come back and say a percentage of their new subscriptions because those new subscriptions initially are only worth $10, but if there is enough fights there to keep people subscribed they could end up being worth $100s so that isn't quantifiable.
Baffles me how many people can't seem to grasp this.Originally posted by Noelanthony View PostWilder was offered 40% to face Joshua. Stop making out Wilder doesn’t turn down offers. Listen to Winkel he is all about marinating and hoping the fight gets bigger. He is a greedy F#ucker. He attends the meeting and his main line of questioning is how much is Joshua getting. Wilder is your client how about what he wants instead of worrying about his clients rival’s pockets
And the rematch...
$100 million for 3 fights is too low. Double it and you're getting warmer...
Comment
-
Originally posted by greeneye99 View PostYour post makes no sense
AJ turning down $50m with no contract & a Flat fee is wrong
But Wilder turning down $100m 3 fight deal is Perfect
You fan boys spin all types of Narratives on here
Lol
Btw
$50m wasn't a Sky offer dumb dumb
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bronx2245 View PostAnd Fury wasn't 42, and coming off nearly an 18 month layoff was he? Fury (age 30) weighed 256.5lbs. vs. Wilder! He was 246 vs. Wlad! Not a big difference for a HW! Just be consistent!
November 27, 2015:
Tyson Fury took one last look into Wladimir Klitschko's eyes before they meet in the ring as they weighed in just a pound apart ahead of Saturday's world heavyweight title showdown.
The British challenger came in at 17st 8lbs, his lightest in three years, while WBA, WBO and IBF champion Klitschko was a pound lighter.
https://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...-a6751676.html
2nd: trying to draw an equivalence between Fury and Klitschko's layoffs is just plain dumb. Not just because one is roughy 30% longer than the other but because the way that any athlete treats their body in their time whilst not competing is fundamental to their likely performance on their return... that's just common sense and widely understood.
Klitschko came into the fight saying "I've been obsessed!"
Fury came into the fight saying "I've been depressed!"
I know they sound similar but it's a significant difference.
I don't even know why you brought up Klitschko anyway... why does everything have to be about Joshua?
Comment
-
Originally posted by lfc19titles View PostOk
You clearly don’t understand how boxing works
The multi deal fight is with Joshua, he has to face Breazeale as it’s his mando
So it’s mando- joshua and Joshua
You are saying dazn should pay money for wilder to fight on showtime ? You are making zero sense
How else are the two Joshua fights going to be made without it becoming a multi fight on dazn ? This has how boxing works
A network that offers the most money way gets it, in This case it’s dazn
Do you understand that concept ?
If showtime offer the same money then they will agree to the two fights on showtime, so that locks both guys for showtime for two fights but they are free to go after that
But in the above case it’s dazn
Jeez man, wake up
Comment
-
Originally posted by Redgloveman View Post1st: losing such a huge amount of weight in such a short time is bound to have an effect on any fighter. This was part of the reason people were expecting a two round win for Wilder
2nd: trying to draw an equivalence between Fury and Klitschko's layoffs is just plain dumb. Not just because one is roughy 30% longer than the other but because the way that any athlete treats their body in their time whilst not competing is fundamental to their likely performance on their return... that's just common sense and widely understood.
Klitschko came into the fight saying "I've been obsessed!"
Fury came into the fight saying "I've been depressed!"
I know they sound similar but it's a significant difference.
I don't even know why you brought up Klitschko anyway... why does everything have to be about Joshua?
Comment
Comment