Spence vs Duran - 147 - who takes it?

[THEFRESHBRAWLER]

Youre comparing a top 5 atg who beat arguably the best fighter of all time in sugar ray leonard, to someone whos best wins are brook coming off a 5th round demolition loss, a kickboxer and shot lamont peterson. And u have the audacity to come into my threads and call me an idiot?

Top5 atg lmao. Holmes Hagler Monzon Ali Ray Robinson Joe Louis Marciano Mayweather Klitschko Frazier all above Duran and those are fighters just off the top of my head

[champion4ever]

Spence would have been too strong for the great Roberto Duran at 147. Unlike Sugar Ray Leonard, Erroll Spence could hit. While Sugar Ray Leonard could box. Leonard was the better boxer at 147 while Spence is the better puncher at 147.

[Tony Trick-Pony]

in the same weekend

In the same night

[Mindgames]

Quitting against Lawlor would be like Mayweather quitting against Pauli Malignaggi

Duran was 40yrs old LMAO. You all always lying about age when it makes your favorite fighter look bad. Canelo Fans swear Canelo was only 20 when he fought Floyd too smh

Duran beat Lawlor at age 48.He lost to Lawlor on an injury, age 40, at that stage hed had nearly one hundred fights, against some of the greatest fighters of all time. Fighting at middle and supermiddle while being smaller in height with a shorter reach than even Floyd, much smaller than Spence,who you have down as an atg for beating a damaged Brook.Duran was still fighting and beating much bigger men, former champions like Castro well into hes forties after a career literally twice as long as these modern guys. Floyd was fighting boxers with 000 records. Errol, in hes prime, is fighting a lightweight, four inches shorter, thinking it makes him p4p number one. You fanboys are laughable.