Originally posted by KRAFTSMAN
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Dillian Whyte's Deal With Top Rank & ESPN Nearing Completion
Collapse
-
[QUOTE=AdonisCreed;19561865]I see what's going on here. I think Bob is going to have Whyte challenge Wilder for the title if Wilder successfully defends the belt against Brezeale. THEN if Whyte beats Wilder it'll be Fury vs Whyte in the UK which will be a huge fight and Bob will keep that belt in house. But if Wilder defeats Whyte it'll finally set up the long awaited rematch of Fury and Wilder next year in 2020.
I like your theory ........due to the fact that wilderquackus and Company with the help of the WeBeCorrupt (WBC) have been avoiding The Villain for a while to the point of skipping him as a mandatoryLast edited by TexasCowBoy; 03-06-2019, 10:39 AM.
Comment
-
Could happen , that's all any of us can do is discuss and debate in this modern day circus of boxing and deep pockets . Not to mention the real lack of high end heavyweight talent available ..
Comment
-
Wilder needs to leave PBC. Far bigger and better fights elsewhere. What are his Heavyweight options? Ancient Ortiz again?
Joshua has Usyk and is the A side of the division. Fury, Whyte, Parker, Pulev all aligned to Top Rank.
Comment
-
Is it for a $100mil deal? No, I am only kidding. However, it does seem that Dillian Whyte is more on a fast track of getting his title shot at Deontay Wilder's WBC heavyweight crown faster than Tyson Fury.
It's because if he wins his lawsuit/appeal against the WBC, then the fight goes a to a purse bid. Therefore, if he wins then he will become Wilder's mandatory opponent after Dominic Breazeale; If there is no Joshua vs Wilder undisputed heavyweight championship fight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by killakali View PostArum likes to copy that Haymon in house styles of fights. Just look at Wilder before he demanded Fury. In a row he fought Spzilka, Arreola, Washington, Stiverne, Ortiz. 4 out of 5 he hep in house and only went outside for Stiverne rematch because he was the mandatory. One thing about Haymon is he’s the king of in house fights.
Arum has Fury, Arum has Jennings, Arum has a co-deal for Pulev, a co-deal with Parker, and Rivas has fought on his platform.
Let's see what fight Arum puts forward first, lol.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Laligalaliga View PostWho is whyte gonna fight to make above 7mil hearn offered him? Fury? Rivas? Parker? Joyce?
Stop hating hearn and look at values and numbers.
Now, who is Whyte going to fight on ESPN+ to justify $4m? Who knows.
Still, Dillian Whyte was built, by Eddie Hearn no less, to be seen as this star of some level, and Whyte went with it.
Whyte and Joshua were supposed to hold hands, own the show together, pay Hearn his 20% after costs, and then split everything else 85/15 Joshua to 80/20 Joshua. Whatever the pay on that was, the terms were clear and Joshua/Hearn didn't want to go for it, so Whyte moved on.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Scipio2009 View PostWhen you've got most of the fighters that matter, fighting a good fight is usually in-house lol.
Arum has Fury, Arum has Jennings, Arum has a co-deal for Pulev, a co-deal with Parker, and Rivas has fought on his platform.
Let's see what fight Arum puts forward first, lol.
Plus who said they are done signing? Maybe they get Wilder and Ortiz too
Comment
-
Originally posted by P4P Forever View PostYou make some good points. What is Espn getting exactly? Been wondering this since they signed Fury?
In a similar way to Fox Sports paying PBC that $60m per year, for 4 years, deal as a way to get fights for FOX but largely as the way to get quality content and quality live content to fill out the sports offering on FS1 (with PBC so far consistently delivering better numbers than the UFC content drew on FOX/FS1, and PBC also giving FOX a significant chunk of the PPV business, expect the value of the next deal to go up, too).
Quality sports content is key right now; and some will reach for not so quality content if needed.
Comment
Comment