Tyson Fury was Disqualified against Christian Hammer

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 4truth
    U can't handle the Truth
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Feb 2016
    • 15281
    • 4,153
    • 1,672
    • 197,686

    #31
    Originally posted by LoadedWraps


    Fury beat Hammer from pillar to post, and was clean. LMAO, Fury living in more posters heads rent free than anyone else in boxing not Floyd.


    WAR FURY!
    Guess we should save a lot of money and time with all this useless drug testing then and have some genius like yourself just tell us who is clean and who is not.

    Comment

    • LoadedWraps
      Official NSB POTY 2016
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Nov 2010
      • 24267
      • 1,021
      • 1,468
      • 190,165

      #32
      Originally posted by miniq
      FURY DID NOT HAVE HIS RESULTS DISQUALIFIED

      "UKAD accepts that because Tyson Fury and Hughie Fury were not put on notice of their alleged UK ADR Article 2.1 violations until June 2016, and because no adverse analytical findings or adverse passport findings were reported in respect of any of the urine and/or blood samples collected from them after February 2015 (including from Tyson Fury on 11 May 2015, 16 July 2015, 8 October 2015, 17 October 2015, 11 November 2015, 13 July 2016, and 4 May 2017; and from Hughie Fury on 11 May 2015, 25 July 2015, 8 October 2015, 17 October 2015, 14 November 2015, 18 July 2016, 29 September 2016, 18 February 2017, 19 April 2017, 8 August 2017, 29 August 2017, and 23 September 2017), therefore in accordance with UK ADR Article 10.8 the competition results they obtained in their fights after February 2015 should not be disqualified.

      SUCK ON THAT ONE

      Fury was not informed of a "failed" test for OVER 1.5 YEARS. OVER 1.5 YEARS! UNHEARD OF. They couldn't build a case against him. Nandrolone is naturally produced in the body. It was a "borderline" failure. Their case was thrown out of court and Fury could have bankrupted UKAD if he continued to proceed with legal action.

      UKAD showed absolute incompetency and complete failures in their handling on the Fury case. They sat on a nothing result then got schooled around a courtroom by a gypo who was on a bender at the time and told them to "F off" when they wanted to test in him late 2016 whilst he was out of the sport & they were taking proceedings against him. Embarrassing. Fury schooled them worse than he schooled Wilder.
      [IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/10ERZqYioLWJ6U/200.gif[/IMG]

      Comment

      • Nash out
        BoxingScene Hall of Fame
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Nov 2018
        • 6168
        • 2,249
        • 1,854
        • 19,416

        #33
        Worst troll thread ever. I like a good troll thread. But this is piss poor.

        Comment

        • chaosisme
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Apr 2013
          • 1348
          • 156
          • 88
          • 25,686

          #34
          Originally posted by THEFRESHBRAWLER
          Looks forward to your response. Mr. know it all.
          Well, it looks that I stand corrected. You're still a douche bag though and an awful poster. I would have green K'd you if you weren't acting like such an ass. I may not live on this forum like a lot of you,but there's still no need to quote my same post twice. I get to 'em when I do. This is obviously a highlight in your life.

          I'm sure things vary between commissions. I don't ever recall hearing or reading about this result being changed. Apparently, it took over a year for them to change it. Maybe you'll get your wish and the BBBofC will change the Fury result.

          Comment

          • chaosisme
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Apr 2013
            • 1348
            • 156
            • 88
            • 25,686

            #35
            Also, the Jack-Bute fight should have been a win for Jack in the first place. I wonder if that factored into things?

            Comment

            • 4truth
              U can't handle the Truth
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Feb 2016
              • 15281
              • 4,153
              • 1,672
              • 197,686

              #36
              Originally posted by miniq
              FURY DID NOT HAVE HIS RESULTS DISQUALIFIED

              "UKAD accepts that because Tyson Fury and Hughie Fury were not put on notice of their alleged UK ADR Article 2.1 violations until June 2016, and because no adverse analytical findings or adverse passport findings were reported in respect of any of the urine and/or blood samples collected from them after February 2015 (including from Tyson Fury on 11 May 2015, 16 July 2015, 8 October 2015, 17 October 2015, 11 November 2015, 13 July 2016, and 4 May 2017; and from Hughie Fury on 11 May 2015, 25 July 2015, 8 October 2015, 17 October 2015, 14 November 2015, 18 July 2016, 29 September 2016, 18 February 2017, 19 April 2017, 8 August 2017, 29 August 2017, and 23 September 2017), therefore in accordance with UK ADR Article 10.8 the competition results they obtained in their fights after February 2015 should not be disqualified.

              SUCK ON THAT ONE

              Fury was not informed of a "failed" test for OVER 1.5 YEARS. OVER 1.5 YEARS! UNHEARD OF. They couldn't build a case against him. Nandrolone is naturally produced in the body. It was a "borderline" failure. Their case was thrown out of court and Fury could have bankrupted UKAD if he continued to proceed with legal action.

              UKAD showed absolute incompetency and complete failures in their handling on the Fury case. They sat on a nothing result then got schooled around a courtroom by a gypo who was on a bender at the time and told them to "F off" when they wanted to test in him late 2016 whilst he as out of the sport & they were taking proceedings against him. Embarrassing. Fury schooled them worse than he schooled Wilder.
              You are gloating over two obviously guilty cheaters partially skating because of a technicality???


              Cong**** you are a real winner!

              Comment

              • THEFRESHBRAWLER
                Undisputed Champion
                • Jul 2013
                • 9408
                • 372
                • 230
                • 124,804

                #37
                Originally posted by 4truth
                Guess we should save a lot of money and time with all this useless drug testing then and have some genius like yourself just tell us who is clean and who is not.
                Lol! Green k

                Comment

                • THEFRESHBRAWLER
                  Undisputed Champion
                  • Jul 2013
                  • 9408
                  • 372
                  • 230
                  • 124,804

                  #38
                  Originally posted by miniq
                  FURY DID NOT HAVE HIS RESULTS DISQUALIFIED

                  "UKAD accepts that because Tyson Fury and Hughie Fury were not put on notice of their alleged UK ADR Article 2.1 violations until June 2016, and because no adverse analytical findings or adverse passport findings were reported in respect of any of the urine and/or blood samples collected from them after February 2015 (including from Tyson Fury on 11 May 2015, 16 July 2015, 8 October 2015, 17 October 2015, 11 November 2015, 13 July 2016, and 4 May 2017; and from Hughie Fury on 11 May 2015, 25 July 2015, 8 October 2015, 17 October 2015, 14 November 2015, 18 July 2016, 29 September 2016, 18 February 2017, 19 April 2017, 8 August 2017, 29 August 2017, and 23 September 2017), therefore in accordance with UK ADR Article 10.8 the competition results they obtained in their fights after February 2015 should not be disqualified.

                  SUCK ON THAT ONE

                  Fury was not informed of a "failed" test for OVER 1.5 YEARS. OVER 1.5 YEARS! UNHEARD OF. They couldn't build a case against him. Nandrolone is naturally produced in the body. It was a "borderline" failure. Their case was thrown out of court and Fury could have bankrupted UKAD if he continued to proceed with legal action.

                  UKAD showed absolute incompetency and complete failures in their handling on the Fury case. They sat on a nothing result then got schooled around a courtroom by a gypo who was on a bender at the time and told them to "F off" when they wanted to test in him late 2016 whilst he was out of the sport & they were taking proceedings against him. Embarrassing. Fury schooled them worse than he schooled Wilder.
                  Tyson Fury fans are liars just like him. You cut out a lot of quotes l. His results were disqualified point blank period.


                  UKAD's position is that the anti-doping rule violations it has asserted have been committed and the consequences set out in the UK Anti-Doping Rules should apply. Tyson and Hughie Fury's position is that they have never knowingly or deliberately committed any anti-doping rule violation. ‎In recognition of the respective counter-arguments and the risks inherent in the dispute resolution process, each side has accepted a compromise of its position.

                  The proceedings have therefore been resolved on the following basis: the anti-doping rule violations based on the reported presence of elevated levels of nandrolone metabolites are upheld, the refusal charge is withdrawn, Hughie and Tyson Fury each receive a two-year period of ineligibility, and their results from their respective fights in February 2015 are disqualified. Taking into account that no adverse analytical findings or adverse passport findings were reported in respect of any of the urine and/or blood samples collected from either boxer after February 2015 (including from Tyson Fury on 11 May 2015, 16 July 2015, 8 October 2015, 17 October 2015, 11 November 2015, 13 July 2016, and 4 May 2017; and from Hughie Fury on 11 May 2015, 25 July 2015, 8 October 2015, 17 October 2015, 14 November 2015, 18 July 2016, 29 September 2016, 18 February 2017, 19 April 2017, 8 August 2017, 29 August 2017, and 23 September 2017), their competition results after February 2015 are not disqualified. Taking into account the delays in results management that meant charges were not brought in respect of the nandrolone findings until June 2016, and the provisional suspensions that Tyson and Hughie Fury have already effectively served, the two year period of ineligibility is backdated to 13 December 2015, and therefore expires at midnight on 12 December 2017





                  D0654496-3-F8-C-4229-900-E-CD4-D4-FF0163-D
                  Last edited by THEFRESHBRAWLER; 03-02-2019, 09:04 PM.

                  Comment

                  • THEFRESHBRAWLER
                    Undisputed Champion
                    • Jul 2013
                    • 9408
                    • 372
                    • 230
                    • 124,804

                    #39
                    Originally posted by miniq
                    FURY DID NOT HAVE HIS RESULTS DISQUALIFIED

                    "UKAD accepts that because Tyson Fury and Hughie Fury were not put on notice of their alleged UK ADR Article 2.1 violations until June 2016, and because no adverse analytical findings or adverse passport findings were reported in respect of any of the urine and/or blood samples collected from them after February 2015 (including from Tyson Fury on 11 May 2015, 16 July 2015, 8 October 2015, 17 October 2015, 11 November 2015, 13 July 2016, and 4 May 2017; and from Hughie Fury on 11 May 2015, 25 July 2015, 8 October 2015, 17 October 2015, 14 November 2015, 18 July 2016, 29 September 2016, 18 February 2017, 19 April 2017, 8 August 2017, 29 August 2017, and 23 September 2017), therefore in accordance with UK ADR Article 10.8 the competition results they obtained in their fights after February 2015 should not be disqualified.

                    SUCK ON THAT ONE

                    Fury was not informed of a "failed" test for OVER 1.5 YEARS. OVER 1.5 YEARS! UNHEARD OF. They couldn't build a case against him. Nandrolone is naturally produced in the body. It was a "borderline" failure. Their case was thrown out of court and Fury could have bankrupted UKAD if he continued to proceed with legal action.

                    UKAD showed absolute incompetency and complete failures in their handling on the Fury case. They sat on a nothing result then got schooled around a courtroom by a gypo who was on a bender at the time and told them to "F off" when they wanted to test in him late 2016 whilst he was out of the sport & they were taking proceedings against him. Embarrassing. Fury schooled them worse than he schooled Wilder.
                    Originally posted by LoadedWraps
                    [IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/10ERZqYioLWJ6U/200.gif[/IMG]
                    Lol anyone can Type LIES.

                    Here’s is the excerpt from the official website.

                    D0654496-3-F8-C-4229-900-E-CD4-D4-FF0163-D




                    The proceedings have therefore been resolved on the following basis: the anti-doping rule violations based on the reported presence of elevated levels of nandrolone metabolites are upheld, the refusal charge is withdrawn, Hughie and Tyson Fury each receive a two-year period of ineligibility, and their results from their respective fights in February 2015 are disqualified. Taking into account that no adverse analytical findings or adverse passport findings were reported in respect of any of the urine and/or blood samples collected from either boxer after February 2015 (including from Tyson Fury on 11 May 2015, 16 July 2015, 8 October 2015, 17 October 2015, 11 November 2015, 13 July 2016, and 4 May 2017; and from Hughie Fury on 11 May 2015, 25 July 2015, 8 October 2015, 17 October 2015, 14 November 2015, 18 July 2016, 29 September 2016, 18 February 2017, 19 April 2017, 8 August 2017, 29 August 2017, and 23 September 2017), their competition results after February 2015 are not disqualified. Taking into account the delays in results management that meant charges were not brought in respect of the nandrolone findings until June 2016, and the provisional suspensions that Tyson and Hughie Fury have already effectively served, the two year period of ineligibility is backdated to 13 December 2015, and therefore expires at midnight on 12 December 2017

                    Comment

                    • THEFRESHBRAWLER
                      Undisputed Champion
                      • Jul 2013
                      • 9408
                      • 372
                      • 230
                      • 124,804

                      #40
                      Originally posted by 4truth
                      You are gloating over two obviously guilty cheaters partially skating because of a technicality???


                      Cong**** you are a real winner!
                      He’s lying. It wasn’t a technicality he purposely left off the first paragraph. Here is the official statement


                      D0654496-3-F8-C-4229-900-E-CD4-D4-FF0163-D

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP