“It’s really hard to have a discussion with someone who has no regards for the truth. You want to hang your hat that you received a detail three page document with all the fight terms and you want to say it’s not a contract because it did not have a signature line? Ok point remains, they got a very detailed summary of all fight terms. Sky as broadcaster in UK and all the requirements of the fight. There was basically radio silence after that.”
They both are playing games to me. First off Espinoza how do you send a 3 page document outlining every detail but leave off a signature line? Was it a rough draft to see if Hearn would agree? Also if Hearn's team read this document then why didn't they counter offer or simply say : add a signature line and it's a deal!? There's enough blame to go around too many egos involved sounds like.
They both are playing games to me. First off Espinoza how do you send a 3 page document outlining every detail but leave off a signature line? Was it a rough draft to see if Hearn would agree? Also if Hearn's team read this document then why didn't they counter offer or simply say : add a signature line and it's a deal!? There's enough blame to go around too many egos involved sounds like.
Comment