Canelo is Hooking up GGG for Jacobs’ Initial IBF morning ditch!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Thuglife Nelo
    Banned
    • Dec 2018
    • 26836
    • 1,299
    • 1,822
    • 654,176

    #1

    Canelo is Hooking up GGG for Jacobs’ Initial IBF morning ditch!

    Props to Canelo for getting GGG’s back when Danny tried to ditch the IBF morning weighin. Danny didn’t care for the straps.

    As Spence says, “Strap Season Only.”
  • daggum
    All time great
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Feb 2008
    • 43693
    • 4,652
    • 3
    • 166,270

    #2
    yes thats definitely why he did it

    Comment

    • Santa_
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Mar 2015
      • 14673
      • 1,417
      • 378
      • 143,233

      #3
      So who put in the reydration clause for this fight was it Canelo or the IBF?

      Comment

      • Thuglife Nelo
        Banned
        • Dec 2018
        • 26836
        • 1,299
        • 1,822
        • 654,176

        #4
        Originally posted by Santa_
        So who put in the reydration clause for this fight was it Canelo or the IBF?
        The IBF cannot impose their rule over another organization, the WBC and WBA. But since Danny didn’t care for the IBF title against GGG was disgraceful. Danny’s Regular WBA wasn’t “unifying” with a main belt that he didn’t even want...

        Therefore, May 5 is Team Canelo-GGG, “Mexican Style!”

        Comment

        • daggum
          All time great
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2008
          • 43693
          • 4,652
          • 3
          • 166,270

          #5
          Originally posted by Santa_
          So who put in the reydration clause for this fight was it Canelo or the IBF?
          apparently canelo did it and lied about it but thats nothing new. i dont know why a guy who just fought at 168 is so worried. if you can survive rocky fielding you can survive anything

          Comment

          • Santa_
            Banned
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Mar 2015
            • 14673
            • 1,417
            • 378
            • 143,233

            #6
            Originally posted by Frankie2Jabs
            The IBF cannot impose their rule over another organization, the WBC and WBA. But since Danny didn’t care for the IBF title against GGG was disgraceful. Danny’s Regular WBA wasn’t “unifying” with a main belt that he didn’t even want...

            Therefore, May 5 is Team Canelo-GGG, “Mexican Style!”

            Oh ok, sounds like a Canelo move.

            Comment

            • Thuglife Nelo
              Banned
              • Dec 2018
              • 26836
              • 1,299
              • 1,822
              • 654,176

              #7
              Originally posted by daggum
              apparently canelo did it and lied about it but thats nothing new. i dont know why a guy who just fought at 168 is so worried. if you can survive rocky fielding you can survive anything
              Team Canelo-GGG is May and September. Mexican style supersedes Brooklyn style. You can’t ditch an IBF rule for a title fight. Was Danny expecting to walk away with a Win content without a strap? That’s Title fight blasphemy! It came back to bite, and Canelo doing the right thing hooking up GGG for that one. It will be like Micky Ward at Gatti’s corner against Floyd.

              Team Canelo-GGG

              boliodogs

              Comment

              • Santa_
                Banned
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Mar 2015
                • 14673
                • 1,417
                • 378
                • 143,233

                #8
                Originally posted by daggum
                apparently canelo did it and lied about it but thats nothing new. i dont know why a guy who just fought at 168 is so worried. if you can survive rocky fielding you can survive anything

                Rocky's big dumb ass kneeling in front of Canelo still cracks me up. They were almost eye to eye.

                Comment

                • Thuglife Nelo
                  Banned
                  • Dec 2018
                  • 26836
                  • 1,299
                  • 1,822
                  • 654,176

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Santa_
                  Oh ok, sounds like a Canelo move.
                  Technically it’s a pseudo IBF move. Canelo’s camp is simply exercising the IBF rule book on a unification. Jacobs would never be able to go against this because he wouldn’t be dumb enough to make a headline that he has to do something that he already does. The Challenge is can Jacobs beat Canelo on the IBF rule?! The same rule he ditched against GGG.

                  The doubt falls on Jacobs, not Canelo. DAZN forced this fight. Any boxing fan that roots for Danny having forfeited the IBF strap while wanting GGG’s others straps yet complaining about Canelo now DKSAB and is a hypocrite.

                  Comment

                  • Santa_
                    Banned
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Mar 2015
                    • 14673
                    • 1,417
                    • 378
                    • 143,233

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Frankie2Jabs
                    Technically it’s a pseudo IBF move. Canelo’s camp is simply exercising the IBF rule book on a unification. Jacobs would never be able to go against this because he wouldn’t be dumb enough to make a headline that he has to do something that he already does. The Challenge is can Jacobs beat Canelo on the IBF rule?! The same rule he ditched against GGG.

                    The doubt falls on Jacobs, not Canelo. DAZN forced this fight. Any boxing fan that roots for Danny having forfeited the IBF strap while wanting GGG’s others straps yet complaining about Canelo now DNSAB and is a hypocrite.

                    Sounds like a pseudo Canelo move too.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP