For the love of god, the WBA really is the worst
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Verdejo-Vasquez For WBA "Gold" Title on Crawford-Khan Card
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by BigZ44 View PostFor the love of god, the WBA really is the worst
And for those wise enough to have never began recognizing the WBO, that leaves only two titles instead of four.
When you only recognize the IBF and WBC, boxing is much easier to follow.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Scipio2009 View PostAn extra trinket that boxing doesn't need. It's to determine the mandatory to the regular champion, who is then mandatory to the "super" champion every 16 months, lol.
Comment
-
From the WBA's perspective, why not keep adding titles? They get a % of the purse for each one. Until the WBA "super" title becomes devalued by these shenanigans, there will be no consequences.
Comment
-
It would be interesting if there was a monthly or quarterly ranking of sanctioning bodies by media members. One thing that might motivate the WBA to change would be the threat of dropping below the IBO to 5th. The main problem with that approach is that it would do more to validate the IBO than to devalue the WBC.
1. IBF
2-3. WBC or WBO
4. WBA
5. IBO
Comment
-
Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View PostThe moment they introduced the super title in 2001, everybody should have immediately ceased recognizing the WBA.
And for those wise enough to have never began recognizing the WBO, that leaves only two titles instead of four.
When you only recognize the IBF and WBC, boxing is much easier to follow.
Comment
-
Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View PostHave been trying for months for the WBA to explain the gold title to me, but they refuse.
When I talk to PBC about it, they insist they don't know what it is and that I need to talk to the WBA.
"Tell him to talk to the WBA about it."
"But we are the WBA."
"Ok then tell him to talk to PBC instead."Last edited by jglvz256; 02-28-2019, 08:52 AM.
Comment
Comment