Comments Thread For: Team Wilder: We're Still Going To Fight on May 18

[Eff Pandas]

He will never fight Ortiz again and I don’t blame him he has dealt with him there is no need to deal with him again and risked getting knocked out. I rate Ortiz but unless he is a mandatory there is no real benefit fighting him. At least if he fought Whyte he would be paid handsomely and he will dispose of Whyte pretty easily in my opinion

Idk that Wilder would never fight Ortiz again. I think he's on the table now (although an unlikely choice) & if Ortiz keeps winning I suspect he'll stay on the table anytime Joshua or Fury isn't the opponent. I do think Ortiz is ancient doe so if he loses he's not getting a rematch with Fury. If he doesn't keep looking solid to great in his fights he's not getting the rematch. Plus being ancient his window to wait isn't THAT long so if he's not getting his shot within the next 4 or so Wilder fights he's not getting that rematch probably. But I do think its a possibility even if it doesn't happen.

[Jkp]

If you couldn’t care less about the past you wouldn’t mention the 50 million saga. If you truly don’t care about resumes don’t compare or talk about them then. You are in self denial if you claim you are not a Wilder fan. Didn’t Fury just fight the baddest man in the planet last fight? Didn’t AJ said 3 percentage offers within the last month to the baddest man on the planet?

Next you will be telling me you don’t care about all the feeble excuses Wilder gave for drawing the fight as Baby oil is a PED

OK. enjoy getting milked and watching Fury/AJ fight bums.

[Ray*]

What did I miss? Why is Fury Wilder not next?

Because he is a big dosser. Plain and simple, he doesn’t want the fight next, “When two fights want a fight then it would happen” - Frank Warren

[Ake-Dawg]

That’s why I use facts and common sense. You are a lover of wilder so I don’t blame you. You wouldn’t necessarily see common sense or objectivity if it hits you in the face when it comes to Wilder.... I swear you still the only poster who defend his team when I claimed they didn’t do a good job for him after 10 years. You would defend anything Wilder, so I take your words with a pinch of salt when it comes to him. You might as well be one of his paramour with the way you go above and beyond to defend anything that might make him look negative.

No need to make up bs about my prior post in an effort to dismiss my claims that you are biased and not objective. Common sense? You basically think that the way you see or interpret things is the gospel and as such represents "the truth" or facts. You have a bug up your azz for Wilder (you acknowledge you are critical). Believe it or not, it impacts your objectivity and influences you to look for an opportunity to call bs, even if it's not there.

Lastly, check my history, I have been critical of Wilder and his team. It's just that in this situation anyone who finds a reason to criticize them regarding the Fury rematch is showing clear bias. Now regarding the Joshua negotiations AFTER THE FURY FIGHT...that's fair game.

[Ray*]

No need to make up bs.

No am dismissing you because I remember you clearly questioning me when I came up with that post. If I have enough time in the next two days I would surely dig that post up. You ask me specifically how they haven’t done enough to propel his name. I was shocked anyone that follow boxing would ask that question. I even remember you saying they are doing a great job.

If you deny it then put a bet on cancelling your account on the forum and never coming back, and I would spend my time digging it out. I remember you clearly. That’s why I take your post regarding Wilder with a pinch of salt.

[that g]

No need to make up bs about my prior post in an effort to dismiss my claims that you are biased and not objective. Common sense? You basically think that the way you see or interpret things is the gospel and as such represents "the truth" or facts. You have a bug up your azz for Wilder (you acknowledge you are critical). Believe it or not, it impacts your objectivity and influences you to look for an opportunity to call bs, even if it's not there.

Lastly, check my history, I have been critical of Wilder and his team. It's just that in this situation anyone who finds a reason to criticize them regarding the Fury rematch is showing clear bias. Now regarding the Joshua negotiations AFTER THE FURY FIGHT...that's fair game.

yea. and i just looked outside. there are pigs flying.

[Noelanthony]

OK. enjoy getting milked and watching Fury/AJ fight bums.

You have a good evening sir

[Noelanthony]

Because he is a big dosser. Plain and simple, he doesn’t want the fight next, “When two fights want a fight then it would happen” - Frank Warren

Lololololol

[Ake-Dawg]

No am dismissing you because I remember you clearly questioning me when I came up with that post. If I have enough time in the next two days I would surely dig that post up. You ask me specifically how they haven’t done enough to propel his name. I was shocked anyone that follow boxing would ask that question. I even remember you saying they are doing a great job.

If you deny it then put a bet on cancelling your account on the forum and never coming back, and I would spend my time digging it out. I remember you clearly. That’s why I take your post regarding Wilder with a pinch of salt.

I swear you still the only poster who defend his team when I claimed they didn’t do a good job for him after 10 years. You would defend anything Wilder,

You can't even get your accusation straight. No need to bet. Besides you're already projecting a question that I may or may not have asked you as defending Wilder's team. A question!

[juggernaut666]

Wilder is an example of a boxer that wants to be paid what he wants, not what he brings to the table or what he generates.

That's why he's a delusional fool like the posters who side with him who are now crying over unfair deals when they were happy he had a great one with Joshua that he walked away from...Mr.A side ! LOl