Comments Thread For: Lomachenko Would Drop Down For Gervonta Davis, Jabs Lopez

[pillowfists98]

Orlando Salido..

Lol have you even watched Berchelt fight? Just because he's Mexican doesn't mean he's a Salido clone. He's got a different style and Lomachenko is a lot more experienced now then he was 5 years ago.

[j.razor]

lol stank davis aka “no one gives a flyin’ **** about”, with 500k views lol why the phuck would Loma P4P bother with that loser? lol no one knows him, and still that puta will run like a hoe supposed too

You know him just as well as l0m0 does.

[pillowfists98]

Haney beats l0m0.

Good joke. Haney would get beat by Davis and Lopez let alone Lomachenko.

[j.razor]

the ugly jerkoff will be made to quit on his stool

Why you dissing l0m0 like that?

[j.razor]

Because he is managed by Mayweathers group , who puts a premium on being undefeated. I thought is was about fighting the best and challenging the best , but times have chamged in boxing, particularly with the Mayweather era.

FOH. T.B.E. beat EVERYONE then ya'll made excuses....LOL

[j.razor]

Loma vs Tank is the fight to make at Super Featherweight.

Devin Haney can fight Teofimo Lopez.

That would be a real nice card.

[j.razor]

Dude floyd always fought most of them past their prime or with a stipulation. Who cares about an 0 The greatest two fighters ever had some 0's . Sugar Ray Robinson and Muhammad Ali. Now what is your argument. Heck even Ray eonard fought guys like this yet he lost. Ray is the one who invented stipulations. Remember the Donny Lalonde fight. It is about challenges. taking on anybody anytime. Would Floyd beat Canelo now, Doubt it seriously, but you would say Floyd is way past it. Well He also made Canelo fight at 152.

He fought everyone when they were on WINNING streaks &/or their prime, you talking about pacquiao & the only reason you dudes started talking about zero losses is to make up a way to discredit T.B.E. just like you dudes say the best of THIS era to discredit him also. If Floyd beat Nelo now you dudes would STILL come up with an excuse but you dudes didn't have an excuse when Floyd beat Hernandez at 21 years of age right, Floyd wasn't too green when he won his 1st title?? T.B.E. at 50 years old you dudes are going to say he can't beat Nelo now, ya'll on some dumb shet….LMMFAO!

[j.razor]

Pac vs Loma at 138! Catchweight. Pac destroyed Hatton at that weight and Loma only has to go up 3 pounds.

Manny needs to retire before he gets put to sleep again..

[j.razor]

Devin Haney is way too feather fisted to give any top fighter an ass beating. And he sure as hell isn't gonna outbox Lomachenko.

I bet he can outbox l0m0.

[j.razor]

So you are basically saying Loma lost his 2nd fight. You stick with the facts here - indeed we have the official decision and no matter how hard you try to debate it, it's still there. And that's fine with me, a fan of Loma as soon as you keep adhering to facts. But no, next thing you turn around and say he had those 6 'pro' fights. Come on man! Has it been made official yet that those fights were professional? On the contrary. So you better choose whether you are staying in this reality where Loma officially lost his 2nd pro fight being a complete amateur or transitioning into your own made up one with these lame excuses like he was a seasoned pro, matured fighter in his prime etc. But in the latter case anyone would have a legitimate right to respond 'what loss?! there was no loss, Loma won that fight'

l0m0 lost. He couldn't take the body shots & did a lot of holding. It was at the end of the fight he started to pick it up but it was too late. He lost a close fight.