Ring girls covered up. Even more than before.

[DoktorSleepless]

RIP then?

['b']

Left leaning ******** are the most sexually degenerate people on the face of the Earth, teaching kids about buttsex, transgenders, female sexual liberation etc. AND YET there is this insane hypocrisy whenever it is an attractive female showing off her body?

If you guys haven't worked it out yet, a female's prime directive, their SOLE purpose is to find the most attractive/'alpha' mate (m8). Notice how they don't care about some fat, ugly, pig looking *** like Schumer get naked? It's because she isn't THREATENING to them. Its a fucced up female biological thing that they don't realise themselves, but a man who pays attention can see it.

Guys are directing their sexual attention to these attractive females while they are being left out. It's another reason why feminists and the ******* crowd have some of the most fucced up ugly women you will ever see. It's all a sexual competition as human beings are highly sexual creatures. It controls everything we do - even if you abstain from sex and ************ your instinct is constantly telling you as a man to work harder and gather more resources (thus making you a more attractive mate) and females are just females - mostly souless creatures focusing on their physical appearance (thus making them more attractive to males).

It's why they went from wanting to ban lingerie models to wanting to replace them with fatties (they call it 'body positive' LOL). They are fine with uglies showing their stuff because
A) they don't feel threatened by fatties/uglies
B) it has the added potential effect of psychologically manipulating men into lowering their standards by finding these whales on a pedestal attractive.

Attractive women don't give a chit about this 'objectification'. In fact, they give so little of a fucc about being objectified that they willingly sign up to be objectified for cold hard CASH!

[millcitymauler]

Left leaning ******** are the most sexually degenerate people on the face of the Earth, teaching kids about buttsex, transgenders, female sexual liberation etc. AND YET there is this insane hypocrisy whenever it is an attractive female showing off her body?

If you guys haven't worked it out yet, a female's prime directive, their SOLE purpose is to find the most attractive/'alpha' mate (m8). Notice how they don't care about some fat, ugly, pig looking *** like Schumer get naked? It's because she isn't THREATENING to them. Its a fucced up female biological thing that they don't realise themselves, but a man who pays attention can see it.

Guys are directing their sexual attention to these attractive females while they are being left out. It's another reason why feminists and the ******* crowd have some of the most fucced up ugly women you will ever see. It's all a sexual competition as human beings are highly sexual creatures. It controls everything we do - even if you abstain from sex and ************ your instinct is constantly telling you as a man to work harder and gather more resources (thus making you a more attractive mate) and females are just females - mostly souless creatures focusing on their physical appearance (thus making them more attractive to males).

It's why they went from wanting to ban lingerie models to wanting to replace them with fatties (they call it 'body positive' LOL). They are fine with uglies showing their stuff because
A) they don't feel threatened by fatties/uglies
B) it has the added potential effect of psychologically manipulating men into lowering their standards by finding these whales on a pedestal attractive.

Attractive women don't give a chit about this 'objectification'. In fact, they give so little of a fucc about being objectified that they willingly sign up to be objectified for cold hard CASH!

Yup...Undeniable Truth of Life #9 state: "Feminism was created to give unattractive women greater access to the mainstream..."

[Willy Wanker]

Lame and gay.

Ring girls are covered up now, but it's okay for male boxers to be sweaty and topless wearing nothing but shorts, gloves and shoes.

What kind of world do we live in these days?

[Eddy Current]

Next thing you know they'll be dressed like this!!!

[MulaKO]

What’s the sound of a bell-end?

You got me there

Lol

[Combat Talk Radio]

RIP then?

YEARS ago - like what...7-8? Good times.

[BoxingIsGreat]

We need less clothes, not more.

[Earl-Hickey]

I've noticed this on even tv commercials too, they often have some hot ass ***** and put her in old ladys clothes trying to cover up her beauty.

[bedi]

DISCLAIMER: Responses of "I DON'T CARE"/"I WATCH FOR THE BOXERS" are free tickets to the list. I'm just sayin.

A while ago, Formula One made the announcement they were going to "ban" grid girls due to ***ism complaints from feminist warriors - even despite the grid girls themselves protesting that they were being put out of a job they enjoyed and wanted to do.

At the time, everyone in boxing management said they weren't going follow that path - and they haven't. Instead we're seeing something different. Something much worse, in my opinion.

Watching Crawford/Khan was the last straw. It's too much. The ring girls are now effectively wearing potato sacks and might as well not even be there.

Case-in-point: Stephanie Ann Cook and Janira Kremets are arguably two of the most beautiful women walking the planet. Yes, Janira is a bit "enhanced", but regardless, even her personality is beautiful.



Here's Cook, over time. Second photo is Crawford/Khan and she looks so damn plain in that outfit it looks like some mic worker got lost and ended up behind the fighters.




Kremets is even more strange. All you need to do is follow Canelo's fight history to see this. She went from a bombshell of an outfit, to a still-okay tight fitting number, to a potato sack where she looked like someone's girlfriend trying to get a selfie for instagram.




Look, I get it. Put attention on the fighters. There's better ways to do that. How about instead of having the ring girls standing right beside fighter, they stand in the further back? How about you adjust lighting to where they're in dimmer lighting than the fighters (this is a concert performance trick)? How about you not put them in colors that completely clash with everyone on stage?

But potato sacks don't work for me. As far as I can tell, UFC and Matchroom are still 'bout that life. Who knows for how long.

I get that people miss the old style, but sports evolve with time. The goal isn’t to erase ring girls but to present them more respectfully, especially in a sport where the focus should be on the fighters. It’s not about “potato sacks,” it’s about balance, you can still have style without turning it into a distraction.